60 months of progressive post-baccalaureate experience meeting labor certification requirements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found the experience letters established only about 54 months of experience involving Devkit and Linux, short of the 60 months required, and identified an unresolved start-date discrepancy that cast doubt on the U.S. employment letter.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the experience letters established only about 54 months of experience involving Devkit and Linux, short of the 60 months required, and identified an unresolved start-date discrepancy that cast doubt on the U.S. employment letter.
The AAO disagreed, finding the transcripts and EDGE report show a 5-year program comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and that the labor certification accepts a foreign equivalent degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO disagreed, finding the transcripts and EDGE report show a 5-year program comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and that the labor certification accepts a foreign equivalent degree.
original scientific or scholarly research contributions of major significance
AAO 为什么未被说服
Letters from the beneficiary's mentors/colleagues were vague and in two cases used identical language; the record lacked corroborating citations or independent evidence that the beneficiary's work had impacted the field at a level consistent with major significance.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters from the beneficiary's mentors/colleagues were vague and in two cases used identical language; the record lacked corroborating citations or independent evidence that the beneficiary's work had impacted the field at a level consistent with major significance.
DOL confirmed it had no substantive concerns about the addresses and would not revoke the labor certification. The petitioner sufficiently showed its headquarters was at the stated address, advertised in the relevant labor market, and its employees worked at various client sites nationwide, establishing the legitimacy of the job offer.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
DOL confirmed it had no substantive concerns about the addresses and would not revoke the labor certification. The petitioner sufficiently showed its headquarters was at the stated address, advertised in the relevant labor market, and its employees worked at various client sites nationwide, establishing the legitimacy of the job offer.
Beneficiary possesses qualifying experience by priority date
AAO 为什么未被说服
Several employer letters failed to describe the beneficiary's actual job duties, preventing the AAO from determining whether he gained qualifying experience at those companies. Without those letters, only about 21 months of qualifying experience could be established, far less than the required 60 months.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Several employer letters failed to describe the beneficiary's actual job duties, preventing the AAO from determining whether he gained qualifying experience at those companies. Without those letters, only about 21 months of qualifying experience could be established, far less than the required 60 months.