AAO reserved the formal final merits determination but noted in the aggregate that the record does not establish the acclaim and recognition required for extraordinary ability classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination but noted in the aggregate that the record does not establish the acclaim and recognition required for extraordinary ability classification.
AAO concluded the evidence showed at most local or regional impact in Florida and failed to demonstrate broader implications, significant potential to employ U.S. workers, or substantial positive economic effects on a national scale.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the evidence showed at most local or regional impact in Florida and failed to demonstrate broader implications, significant potential to employ U.S. workers, or substantial positive economic effects on a national scale.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met prong 1 because his research findings are disseminated to others in the field through scientific journals and conferences, supporting broader implications for the field.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met prong 1 because his research findings are disseminated to others in the field through scientific journals and conferences, supporting broader implications for the field.
membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because Petitioner did not present independent, objective evidence of his membership with the organization, and did not show the organization qualifies as a professional association requiring members to hold a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because Petitioner did not present independent, objective evidence of his membership with the organization, and did not show the organization qualifies as a professional association requiring members to hold a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent.
ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
AAO 为什么未被说服
Petitioner's claimed timeline covers only approximately four-to-five years (2016-2020), short of ten years. The submitted employment letters do not indicate full-time experience, no letters were provided for the self-employment claim, and unresolved inconsistencies from a prior EB-1A proceeding regarding employment with [REDACTED] remain.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner's claimed timeline covers only approximately four-to-five years (2016-2020), short of ten years. The submitted employment letters do not indicate full-time experience, no letters were provided for the self-employment claim, and unresolved inconsistencies from a prior EB-1A proceeding regarding employment with [REDACTED] remain.