60 months of qualifying experience as controller or senior accountant
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO identified material inconsistencies regarding employment dates, titles, duties, and a contradictory G-325A claim of unemployment, none of which were resolved by independent objective evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO identified material inconsistencies regarding employment dates, titles, duties, and a contradictory G-325A claim of unemployment, none of which were resolved by independent objective evidence.
Petitioner did not address the basis for the prior dismissal and instead requested additional time to obtain evidence from Egypt; counsel later conceded the inability to obtain additional evidence. The governing regulation contains no provision for additional time to submit evidence on motion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not address the basis for the prior dismissal and instead requested additional time to obtain evidence from Egypt; counsel later conceded the inability to obtain additional evidence. The governing regulation contains no provision for additional time to submit evidence on motion.
The AAO found that mere authorship of scholarly articles cannot satisfy this criterion absent evidence of major significance; journal impact factors assess the journal rather than individual articles; citation counts were not shown to be above the level typical for contributions of major significance; and government funding and website references at most show the work is useful, not that it constitutes major contributions.…
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that mere authorship of scholarly articles cannot satisfy this criterion absent evidence of major significance; journal impact factors assess the journal rather than individual articles; citation counts were not shown to be above the level typical for contributions of major significance; and government funding and website references at most show the work is useful, not that it constitutes major contributions. The petitioner also abandoned the reference letter issue by not challenging it on appeal.
The AAO found the translation certification deficient because it did not state the translator's competence in Chinese-to-English translation, the website claimed as major media had a significantly lower global rank than foxnews.com, one article did not mention the petitioner, and neither article included author information as required by the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the translation certification deficient because it did not state the translator's competence in Chinese-to-English translation, the website claimed as major media had a significantly lower global rank than foxnews.com, one article did not mention the petitioner, and neither article included author information as required by the criterion.
The AAO found that the association's senior membership requirements (10 years of professional practice and publication of papers) do not constitute outstanding achievements, and there was no showing that recognized national or international experts judge applicants' achievements.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the association's senior membership requirements (10 years of professional practice and publication of papers) do not constitute outstanding achievements, and there was no showing that recognized national or international experts judge applicants' achievements. The petitioner's faculty position as dean was also insufficient because a university is not an association in the field, and the supporting letter was merely conclusory and inconsistent with an earlier letter from the same source.
benefit to national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO finds the petitioner's credentials, awards, and reference letters show local effectiveness but no past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. AAO rejects the argument that NCLBA's highly-qualified-teacher standard or DOL debarment of the prior employer creates a waiver, and rejects reliance on an unpublished approval of another teacher.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the petitioner's credentials, awards, and reference letters show local effectiveness but no past history of demonstrable achievement with influence on the field as a whole. AAO rejects the argument that NCLBA's highly-qualified-teacher standard or DOL debarment of the prior employer creates a waiver, and rejects reliance on an unpublished approval of another teacher.
national interest served to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that the petitioner's citation record was minimal (only six citations of his doctoral dissertation, mostly from his home institution), witness letters largely speculated about future impact rather than established existing influence, post-filing evidence could not be used to show eligibility at time of filing, and the petitioner's employment at a federal agency did not constitute a blanket basis for the waiver.…
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the petitioner's citation record was minimal (only six citations of his doctoral dissertation, mostly from his home institution), witness letters largely speculated about future impact rather than established existing influence, post-filing evidence could not be used to show eligibility at time of filing, and the petitioner's employment at a federal agency did not constitute a blanket basis for the waiver. The petitioner failed to establish that his work had influenced the field to the degree required for a national interest waiver.