可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 20911–20920

NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO finds that the petitioner's work as an elementary school teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds that the petitioner's work as an elementary school teacher is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_04_B5203; source_row=17099
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concludes the record shows only impact on the petitioner's own students and local school system, with no evidence of influence on the field of education at a national level. NYSDOT specifically cites a single schoolteacher in one elementary school as an example where benefits would not be national in scope.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes the record shows only impact on the petitioner's own students and local school system, with no evidence of influence on the field of education at a national level. NYSDOT specifically cites a single schoolteacher in one elementary school as an example where benefits would not be national in scope.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_04_B5203; source_row=17100
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met this criterion, as the record supports the finding.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met this criterion, as the record supports the finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_02_B2203; source_row=17089
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's agricultural research work has substantial intrinsic merit.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's agricultural research work has substantial intrinsic merit.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_03_B5203; source_row=17096
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the director that the proposed benefit from the petitioner's research is national in scope.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the director that the proposed benefit from the petitioner's research is national in scope.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_03_B5203; source_row=17097
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO upheld the prior finding that the petitioner had not shown her work would provide a benefit national in scope. The collective importance of the teaching profession does not establish that this individual teacher's impact is national in scope.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO upheld the prior finding that the petitioner had not shown her work would provide a benefit national in scope. The collective importance of the teaching profession does not establish that this individual teacher's impact is national in scope.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_02_B5203; source_row=17094
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO upheld the prior finding that the petitioner did not demonstrate she would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications. Employer debarment does not substitute for this showing, and the NCLBA does not alter the NYSDOT standard.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO upheld the prior finding that the petitioner did not demonstrate she would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications. Employer debarment does not substitute for this showing, and the NCLBA does not alter the NYSDOT standard.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_02_B5203; source_row=17095
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

裁决如何说明

The AAO did not dispute the intrinsic merit of the petitioner's occupation in the prior appellate decision and it was not contested on motion.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO did not dispute the intrinsic merit of the petitioner's occupation in the prior appellate decision and it was not contested on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_02_B5203; source_row=17093
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床15 篇论文

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the director's finding that the beneficiary's research could produce benefits national in scope, although it observed the beneficiary's actual clinical work is local.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the director's finding that the beneficiary's research could produce benefits national in scope, although it observed the beneficiary's actual clinical work is local.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_01_B5203; source_row=17085
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床15 篇论文

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO accepted the director's finding that the beneficiary's field has substantial intrinsic merit and noted the director already acknowledged the importance of the field.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepted the director's finding that the beneficiary's field has substantial intrinsic merit and noted the director already acknowledged the importance of the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-10-21_01_B5203; source_row=17084
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评