可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 20981–20990

EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

Counsel did not contest this criterion in the motion to reopen/reconsider and offered no specific analysis of evidence or legal authority on appeal beyond passing references, so the issue was deemed abandoned.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel did not contest this criterion in the motion to reopen/reconsider and offered no specific analysis of evidence or legal authority on appeal beyond passing references, so the issue was deemed abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17018
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations

裁决如何说明

Counsel did not provide additional evidence or identify errors of law or fact in the director's analysis in the appellate brief, so the AAO considered the claim abandoned.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel did not provide additional evidence or identify errors of law or fact in the director's analysis in the appellate brief, so the AAO considered the claim abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17015
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding that there is sufficient documentation that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements of the regulation through his research proposal and manuscript review positions.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding that there is sufficient documentation that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements of the regulation through his research proposal and manuscript review positions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17017
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

裁决如何说明

Counsel provided no additional evidence or discussion identifying errors of law or fact in the director's analysis on appeal, so the claim was deemed abandoned.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel provided no additional evidence or discussion identifying errors of law or fact in the director's analysis on appeal, so the claim was deemed abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17020
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements for this criterion, and the record supports the director's finding.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner satisfies the plain language requirements for this criterion, and the record supports the director's finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=17019
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The director failed to discuss the petitioner's claim of major contributions. The AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's publications were frequently cited, had significantly influenced business practices, or otherwise constituted original contributions of major significance. The finding was further undermined by the petitioner's false authorship claims.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The director failed to discuss the petitioner's claim of major contributions. The AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's publications were frequently cited, had significantly influenced business practices, or otherwise constituted original contributions of major significance. The finding was further undermined by the petitioner's false authorship claims.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_01_B2203; source_row=16999
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO noted the director erroneously found no evidence had been submitted, but nonetheless agreed with the ultimate denial. The submitted articles lacked full certified English translations, failed to identify authors or dates, and lacked evidence establishing the publications as major media.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO noted the director erroneously found no evidence had been submitted, but nonetheless agreed with the ultimate denial. The submitted articles lacked full certified English translations, failed to identify authors or dates, and lacked evidence establishing the publications as major media.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_01_B2203; source_row=16998
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能工程师

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

labor certification requires advanced degree professional

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO finds the 'or equivalent' modifier on the labor certification, combined with the 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(h)(4)(ii) language, allows qualification with less than a full bachelor's degree, defeating advanced degree professional classification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the 'or equivalent' modifier on the labor certification, combined with the 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(h)(4)(ii) language, allows qualification with less than a full bachelor's degree, defeating advanced degree professional classification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_04_B5203; source_row=17012
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate (single-source degree)

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO distinguished the cited 2010 AAO decision because there the labor certification did not require an advanced degree, whereas here both the labor certification and the I-140 do. The beneficiary's examination certificates from a professional association do not constitute a foreign equivalent degree from an accredited college or university.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO distinguished the cited 2010 AAO decision because there the labor certification did not require an advanced degree, whereas here both the labor certification and the I-140 do. The beneficiary's examination certificates from a professional association do not constitute a foreign equivalent degree from an accredited college or university.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_03_B5203; source_row=17009
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest served substantially greater than available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the petitioner's credentials and activities reflect exceptional ability at most, but exceptional ability is not grounds for the waiver. Her involvement in programs like Reading Together did not extend beyond the local level and did not establish impact and influence sufficient to distinguish her from qualified U.S. workers.…

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's credentials and activities reflect exceptional ability at most, but exceptional ability is not grounds for the waiver. Her involvement in programs like Reading Together did not extend beyond the local level and did not establish impact and influence sufficient to distinguish her from qualified U.S. workers. National Board Certification was received after the filing date and reflects additional training rather than national-level impact. Evidence of national dissemination (blog, articles, future conference) arose after the filing date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=17005
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评