The AAO reserved the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reserved the final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
published material about the alien in professional or major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Counsel merely repeated prior claims without explaining why the AAO should find them more persuasive, and provided no additional evidence or arguments identifying errors. The issue was therefore abandoned.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel merely repeated prior claims without explaining why the AAO should find them more persuasive, and provided no additional evidence or arguments identifying errors. The issue was therefore abandoned.
The beneficiary's Diploma from a polytechnic and Associate Membership in a professional engineering body do not constitute a degree from a college or university equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate. Both the EDGE database and the petitioner's own AACRAO evaluation characterize the Associate Membership as a professional examination credential rather than a degree.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's Diploma from a polytechnic and Associate Membership in a professional engineering body do not constitute a degree from a college or university equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate. Both the EDGE database and the petitioner's own AACRAO evaluation characterize the Associate Membership as a professional examination credential rather than a degree. Without a single qualifying foreign equivalent degree, the beneficiary cannot satisfy the advanced degree requirement even with five-plus years of progressive experience.
AAO found the petitioner mischaracterized the report's quartile data, did not show her salary fell within the third quartile for her actual position, and provided no comparative data for research fees as 'other remuneration.'
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner mischaracterized the report's quartile data, did not show her salary fell within the third quartile for her actual position, and provided no comparative data for research fees as 'other remuneration.'
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO held inclusion as a peer reviewer is not membership in an association, and even if it were, the requirements are not outstanding achievements judged by national/international experts. The ESM and EM research groups were not shown to be associations requiring outstanding achievements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held inclusion as a peer reviewer is not membership in an association, and even if it were, the requirements are not outstanding achievements judged by national/international experts. The ESM and EM research groups were not shown to be associations requiring outstanding achievements.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the petitioner established a leading/critical role at one university but not its distinguished reputation, and established UdN's distinguished reputation but not her leading/critical role for UdN as a whole or that IDS itself enjoys a distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner established a leading/critical role at one university but not its distinguished reputation, and established UdN's distinguished reputation but not her leading/critical role for UdN as a whole or that IDS itself enjoys a distinguished reputation.