可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 21231–21240

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

beneficiary meets MBA requirement on ETA Form 9089

AAO 为什么未被说服

Part H of the labor certification requires an MBA with no alternate combination acceptable; because the beneficiary's degree is from an unaccredited institution, it does not qualify as a U.S. MBA, and the beneficiary therefore fails the labor certification's educational requirement.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Part H of the labor certification requires an MBA with no alternate combination acceptable; because the beneficiary's degree is from an unaccredited institution, it does not qualify as a U.S. MBA, and the beneficiary therefore fails the labor certification's educational requirement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-10_01_B5203; source_row=16729
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他98 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

The AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-10_01_B2203; source_row=16727
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他98 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

Only three of the petitioner's articles garnered moderate citation, and the citations generally provide background information rather than demonstrating reliance on the petitioner's findings. Expert letters described future potential impact rather than present-day significance, and published coverage was brief without showing how the field was utilizing the results.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Only three of the petitioner's articles garnered moderate citation, and the citations generally provide background information rather than demonstrating reliance on the petitioner's findings. Expert letters described future potential impact rather than present-day significance, and published coverage was brief without showing how the field was utilizing the results.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-10_01_B2203; source_row=16725
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concluded the petitioner showed no track record establishing she would serve the national interest more than other qualified ESL teachers, and that labor shortage claims must be addressed through labor certification.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the petitioner showed no track record establishing she would serve the national interest more than other qualified ESL teachers, and that labor shortage claims must be addressed through labor certification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=16721
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO acknowledged that the petitioner's assertions addressed the intrinsic merit of ESL education, the first prong of NYSDOT.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged that the petitioner's assertions addressed the intrinsic merit of ESL education, the first prong of NYSDOT.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=16719
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the petitioner's work as a local ESL teacher was not national in scope, and that the 2012 MSA results did not show she had effectively closed the achievement gap.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the petitioner's work as a local ESL teacher was not national in scope, and that the 2012 MSA results did not show she had effectively closed the achievement gap.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=16720
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

社会科学学士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO rejected counsel's unsupported claim that foreign teachers are superior to U.S. workers, noting it lacks evidentiary support. AAO also found the petitioner had already obtained an approved labor certification and approved petition under EB-3, showing labor certification was achievable. The petitioner did not show her 'Highly Qualified' credentials imposed requirements significantly more stringent than DOL minimums.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected counsel's unsupported claim that foreign teachers are superior to U.S. workers, noting it lacks evidentiary support. AAO also found the petitioner had already obtained an approved labor certification and approved petition under EB-3, showing labor certification was achievable. The petitioner did not show her 'Highly Qualified' credentials imposed requirements significantly more stringent than DOL minimums.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-05_01_B5203; source_row=16718
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学学士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately analyze whether the petitioner's work has substantial intrinsic merit, proceeding to find the petition fails on other grounds.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately analyze whether the petitioner's work has substantial intrinsic merit, proceeding to find the petition fails on other grounds.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-05_01_B5203; source_row=16716
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学学士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that counsel's arguments about the NCLBA and national educational interests do not establish that this petitioner's individual contributions are national in scope. The NCLBA did not amend the immigration statute, and the key NYSDOT provision requires a record of influence on the field as a whole, which the petitioner did not demonstrate.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that counsel's arguments about the NCLBA and national educational interests do not establish that this petitioner's individual contributions are national in scope. The NCLBA did not amend the immigration statute, and the key NYSDOT provision requires a record of influence on the field as a whole, which the petitioner did not demonstrate.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-07-05_01_B5203; source_row=16717
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO affirmed that no single credential constitutes a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate. The B.A. was a two-year degree in social sciences, not a four-year engineering degree. The AACRAO evaluation confirmed the B.A. is comparable to only two to three years of undergraduate study in the U.S. The Institution of Engineers examination certificate, though AACRAO rated it comparable to a U.S.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO affirmed that no single credential constitutes a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate. The B.A. was a two-year degree in social sciences, not a four-year engineering degree. The AACRAO evaluation confirmed the B.A. is comparable to only two to three years of undergraduate study in the U.S. The Institution of Engineers examination certificate, though AACRAO rated it comparable to a U.S. engineering bachelor's, is not a degree from a college or university and therefore cannot qualify as a 'foreign equivalent degree' under the regulations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-06-28_07_B5203; source_row=16707
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评