The petitioner did not pay the full proffered wage of $87,006 in any year from 2008 to 2012, leaving gaps ranging from $3,792.40 to $34,273.20 per year.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not pay the full proffered wage of $87,006 in any year from 2008 to 2012, leaving gaps ranging from $3,792.40 to $34,273.20 per year.
Net income sufficient to cover proffered wage shortfall for all sponsored beneficiaries
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's net income ($12,632 in 2008; $13,051 in 2009; $3,258 in 2010; $13,116 in 2011) was insufficient to cover the shortfalls for the beneficiary alone, and the petitioner failed to supply priority dates and proffered wages for other beneficiaries, preventing a full analysis.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's net income ($12,632 in 2008; $13,051 in 2009; $3,258 in 2010; $13,116 in 2011) was insufficient to cover the shortfalls for the beneficiary alone, and the petitioner failed to supply priority dates and proffered wages for other beneficiaries, preventing a full analysis.
Bona fide and realistic job offer at certified location
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO was unpersuaded that the job description language established client-site or remote work, and counsel did not explain the absence of workers at the business location or provide evidence that the petitioner actually operated there.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO was unpersuaded that the job description language established client-site or remote work, and counsel did not explain the absence of workers at the business location or provide evidence that the petitioner actually operated there.
60 months of qualifying experience in the job offered
AAO 为什么未被说服
The experience letters on appeal lacked required duty descriptions, were not on company letterhead, and bore uncertified translations; counsel's brief offered only unsupported assertions and did not constitute independent objective evidence sufficient to resolve the inconsistencies identified by the director.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The experience letters on appeal lacked required duty descriptions, were not on company letterhead, and bore uncertified translations; counsel's brief offered only unsupported assertions and did not constitute independent objective evidence sufficient to resolve the inconsistencies identified by the director.
AAO affirmed that only degrees from institutions accredited by a regional accrediting agency recognized by DOE and CHEA qualify as advanced degrees under the regulation. California BPPE approval is a lower-level endorsement not guaranteeing nationwide recognition, and SEVP certification and credit acceptance by another unaccredited institution are legally irrelevant to the advanced degree determination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed that only degrees from institutions accredited by a regional accrediting agency recognized by DOE and CHEA qualify as advanced degrees under the regulation. California BPPE approval is a lower-level endorsement not guaranteeing nationwide recognition, and SEVP certification and credit acceptance by another unaccredited institution are legally irrelevant to the advanced degree determination.
AAO did not reach the merits of the ability-to-pay issue because the evidence submitted on motion (the 2010 tax return) was not new and therefore could not serve as a proper basis for reopening.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the merits of the ability-to-pay issue because the evidence submitted on motion (the 2010 tax return) was not new and therefore could not serve as a proper basis for reopening.
beneficiary experience qualifying per labor certification
裁决如何说明
AAO did not reach the merits because the degree and transcripts submitted on motion were not new evidence — they were available at the time the director issued the RFE and when the petitioner filed the appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the merits because the degree and transcripts submitted on motion were not new evidence — they were available at the time the director issued the RFE and when the petitioner filed the appeal.
beneficiary possesses required Master's degree or foreign equivalent
AAO 为什么未被说服
The beneficiary's record did not demonstrate completion of the second year of the Irish Master's program or a thesis defense, the AACRAO evaluation was unsigned and inconsistent with EDGE data, there were unresolved inconsistencies in the conferred date and the major field of study between the labor certification and the degree certificate.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's record did not demonstrate completion of the second year of the Irish Master's program or a thesis defense, the AACRAO evaluation was unsigned and inconsistent with EDGE data, there were unresolved inconsistencies in the conferred date and the major field of study between the labor certification and the degree certificate.