可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 21212130

EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他经理学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO previously affirmed denial under (ii); the new evidence regarding AADE board/steering committee did not establish membership reserved for those with national/international acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously affirmed denial under (ii); the new evidence regarding AADE board/steering committee did not establish membership reserved for those with national/international acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_03_B2203; source_row=41963
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他经理学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO weighed the totality of the evidence and found Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national/international acclaim or top-of-field standing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO weighed the totality of the evidence and found Petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national/international acclaim or top-of-field standing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_03_B2203; source_row=41970
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Beneficiary's accounting management services would not have broader implications beyond her company and its clients, and that the Petitioner failed to provide corroborating evidence of claimed job creation or substantial positive economic effects attributable to the Beneficiary's specific work.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Beneficiary's accounting management services would not have broader implications beyond her company and its clients, and that the Petitioner failed to provide corroborating evidence of claimed job creation or substantial positive economic effects attributable to the Beneficiary's specific work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_01_B5203; source_row=41954
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved this prong, declining to address it because the dispositive first-prong failure rendered it unnecessary to reach.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved this prong, declining to address it because the dispositive first-prong failure rendered it unnecessary to reach.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_05_B5203; source_row=41979
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO noted that letters praising the Petitioner's skills are relevant to prong two, but declined to reach this prong because the case was dispositive on prong one's national importance requirement.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that letters praising the Petitioner's skills are relevant to prong two, but declined to reach this prong because the case was dispositive on prong one's national importance requirement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_08_B5203; source_row=41988
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO did not address prong three, as the case was decided against the Petitioner on prong one.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not address prong three, as the case was decided against the Petitioner on prong one.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_08_B5203; source_row=41989
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the second prong because its finding on national importance under prong one was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the second prong because its finding on national importance under prong one was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_09_B5203; source_row=41991
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the third prong because its finding on national importance under prong one was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because its finding on national importance under prong one was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_09_B5203; source_row=41992
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the record shows limited competition history ending in 2015, modest media coverage, and community recognition within Argentina, but does not rise to the level of sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the record shows limited competition history ending in 2015, modest media coverage, and community recognition within Argentina, but does not rise to the level of sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_02_B2203; source_row=41962
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others in the field

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met criterion (iv) by documenting his participation as a judge in two downhill longboard competitions held in Argentina in 2018 and 2022.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met criterion (iv) by documenting his participation as a judge in two downhill longboard competitions held in Argentina in 2018 and 2022.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-11-22_02_B2203; source_row=41960
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评