AAO found the director's analysis was faulty because it used the parent company's financials instead of the petitioner subsidiary's own financials, and improperly discounted and then ignored the CEO's statement. The matter is remanded for proper analysis.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the director's analysis was faulty because it used the parent company's financials instead of the petitioner subsidiary's own financials, and improperly discounted and then ignored the CEO's statement. The matter is remanded for proper analysis.
AAO found the director failed to address evidence submitted in response to the second NOID, including the offer letter, and remanded for consideration of that evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the director failed to address evidence submitted in response to the second NOID, including the offer letter, and remanded for consideration of that evidence.
AAO concluded that the petitioner's two businesses under one umbrella and expansion plans reasonably support the need for a market research analyst, and the director failed to identify record inconsistencies sufficient to doubt the veracity of the information.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded that the petitioner's two businesses under one umbrella and expansion plans reasonably support the need for a market research analyst, and the director failed to identify record inconsistencies sufficient to doubt the veracity of the information.
The beneficiary's degree copy had liquid paper obscuring text, transcripts were not submitted as required by regulation, and the beneficiary's reported four-month enrollment was implausible given the school's stated 12–24 month minimum program length, precluding a positive determination of qualification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's degree copy had liquid paper obscuring text, transcripts were not submitted as required by regulation, and the beneficiary's reported four-month enrollment was implausible given the school's stated 12–24 month minimum program length, precluding a positive determination of qualification.
The petitioner's 2010 tax return reporting only $1,889 in wages and salaries for three employees raises doubt about the accuracy of the financial information, and the record lacks evidence of ability to pay from the priority date of May 6, 2011 onward.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's 2010 tax return reporting only $1,889 in wages and salaries for three employees raises doubt about the accuracy of the financial information, and the record lacks evidence of ability to pay from the priority date of May 6, 2011 onward.
The beneficiary's three-year Bachelor of Commerce degree is not a foreign equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree under Matter of Shah and EDGE/AACRAO resources. The three submitted credential evaluations reached inconsistent conclusions and were therefore unpersuasive. Combining lesser degrees or work experience with education produces only an 'equivalent' rather than a foreign equivalent degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's three-year Bachelor of Commerce degree is not a foreign equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree under Matter of Shah and EDGE/AACRAO resources. The three submitted credential evaluations reached inconsistent conclusions and were therefore unpersuasive. Combining lesser degrees or work experience with education produces only an 'equivalent' rather than a foreign equivalent degree.
The duplicate certified ETA Form 9089 was unsigned by all required parties (employer, beneficiary, attorney/agent), which independently bars approval under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(a)(1).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The duplicate certified ETA Form 9089 was unsigned by all required parties (employer, beneficiary, attorney/agent), which independently bars approval under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(a)(1).
Five years of progressive experience as required by labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The experience letters were deficient: one did not describe the beneficiary's duties and listed a conflicting location; another was dated before the beneficiary's stated end-date of employment; and a third failed to describe duties. These discrepancies undermined the veracity of the submitted evidence, and the petitioner failed to submit updated or corrective letters in response to the RFE/NOID.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The experience letters were deficient: one did not describe the beneficiary's duties and listed a conflicting location; another was dated before the beneficiary's stated end-date of employment; and a third failed to describe duties. These discrepancies undermined the veracity of the submitted evidence, and the petitioner failed to submit updated or corrective letters in response to the RFE/NOID.
The petitioner's 2011 net income of $54,913 and net current assets of $401,802 were insufficient to cover the proffered wage for the beneficiary and all other sponsored beneficiaries. The petitioner failed to show wages paid to this beneficiary and provided incomplete, inconsistent information about other petitions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's 2011 net income of $54,913 and net current assets of $401,802 were insufficient to cover the proffered wage for the beneficiary and all other sponsored beneficiaries. The petitioner failed to show wages paid to this beneficiary and provided incomplete, inconsistent information about other petitions.
advanced degree or equivalent (bachelor's + 5 years progressive experience)
证据为何得到认可
Relying on EDGE and the Trustforte evaluations, AAO found the DOEACC 'B' Level Master's Diploma comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and the employment verification letters established five years and five months of progressive experience in the specialty.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Relying on EDGE and the Trustforte evaluations, AAO found the DOEACC 'B' Level Master's Diploma comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and the employment verification letters established five years and five months of progressive experience in the specialty.