AAO finds the petitioner's classroom work has only local impact and that 'unquantifiable factors that zero in on passion' do not address the national scope requirement.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the petitioner's classroom work has only local impact and that 'unquantifiable factors that zero in on passion' do not address the national scope requirement.
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concludes the petitioner did not show his work had national impact or that he stands apart from other special education teachers. Awards from the Philippines lacked context, and U.S. work showed no comparable distinction. Mastery of existing techniques and shortage arguments are insufficient.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes the petitioner did not show his work had national impact or that he stands apart from other special education teachers. Awards from the Philippines lacked context, and U.S. work showed no comparable distinction. Mastery of existing techniques and shortage arguments are insufficient.
The AAO affirmed the director's finding, noting counsel simply restated the director's finding without explaining the error. The AAO also noted that criterion viii requires a leading or critical role in more than one organization with a distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO affirmed the director's finding, noting counsel simply restated the director's finding without explaining the error. The AAO also noted that criterion viii requires a leading or critical role in more than one organization with a distinguished reputation.
The AAO concurred with the director's assessment that the expert letters used speculative language ('might,' 'could,' 'may') about future applicability of the beneficiary's model, which was insufficient to establish an original contribution of major significance at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO concurred with the director's assessment that the expert letters used speculative language ('might,' 'could,' 'may') about future applicability of the beneficiary's model, which was insufficient to establish an original contribution of major significance at the time of filing.
labor certification requires advanced degree professional
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed with the Director that the box 14 language permitting any suitable combination eliminated any required minimum educational credential, so the labor certification cannot support advanced degree professional classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the box 14 language permitting any suitable combination eliminated any required minimum educational credential, so the labor certification cannot support advanced degree professional classification.
advanced degree professional requirement on labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO confirmed the director's reading of Box 14 and added that the beneficiary's foreign Masters of Computer Management equates only to a U.S. bachelor's degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed the director's reading of Box 14 and added that the beneficiary's foreign Masters of Computer Management equates only to a U.S. bachelor's degree.
beneficiary holds required degree in required field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The beneficiary's bachelor of law degree from a Korean university does not satisfy the labor certification requirement of a degree in business administration or marketing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's bachelor of law degree from a Korean university does not satisfy the labor certification requirement of a degree in business administration or marketing.