可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 21821–21830

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

数学 / 统计

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's website lacked evidence of widespread use; his publications were internal school journals of very limited circulation; and his impact was confined to the local schools and districts where he personally worked, not demonstrating national scope.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's website lacked evidence of widespread use; his publications were internal school journals of very limited circulation; and his impact was confined to the local schools and districts where he personally worked, not demonstrating national scope.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_02_B5203; source_row=16051
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

AAO acknowledged that publications and presentations provide benefits national in scope, but emphasized this only matters if the petitioner continues to perform research.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged that publications and presentations provide benefits national in scope, but emphasized this only matters if the petitioner continues to perform research.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_08_B5203; source_row=16069
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than a qualified U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the citation record thin (largely tied to one literature-review article), found the witness letters generalized and partially boilerplate, found that the Merci device usage claim was undermined by prior published reports by others, and concluded that learning advanced procedures and teaching them to peers does not equate to innovation.…

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the citation record thin (largely tied to one literature-review article), found the witness letters generalized and partially boilerplate, found that the Merci device usage claim was undermined by prior published reports by others, and concluded that learning advanced procedures and teaching them to peers does not equate to innovation. AAO also found the petitioner's status as a junior resident inconsistent with claims of being among the nation's top specialists.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_08_B5203; source_row=16070
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not separately contest substantial intrinsic merit of neurosurgery and related research.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately contest substantial intrinsic merit of neurosurgery and related research.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_08_B5203; source_row=16068
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay via net income

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although the petitioner's 2007 net income of $116,299 nominally exceeded the proffered wage, when the aggregate salary shortfall of approximately $188,094 for 9 other simultaneously pending petitions is considered, the net income is insufficient to cover all obligations.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the petitioner's 2007 net income of $116,299 nominally exceeded the proffered wage, when the aggregate salary shortfall of approximately $188,094 for 9 other simultaneously pending petitions is considered, the net income is insufficient to cover all obligations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_05_B5203; source_row=16060
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay via wages actually paid to beneficiary

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner paid the beneficiary only $67,295.50 in 2007, which was $2,704.50 less than the $70,000 proffered wage. Full payment was established only for 2008–2011.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner paid the beneficiary only $67,295.50 in 2007, which was $2,704.50 less than the $70,000 proffered wage. Full payment was established only for 2008–2011.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_05_B5203; source_row=16059
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay via net current assets

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's 2007 net current assets of $102,112 nominally exceeded the individual proffered wage shortfall, but the combined shortfall of $188,094 for all simultaneously pending petitions exceeded net current assets as well.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's 2007 net current assets of $102,112 nominally exceeded the individual proffered wage shortfall, but the combined shortfall of $188,094 for all simultaneously pending petitions exceeded net current assets as well.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_05_B5203; source_row=16061
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay via totality of circumstances (Matter of Sonegawa)

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO considered broader business factors under Sonegawa but found no evidence of significant growth, outstanding business reputation, or uncharacteristic expenditures. The presence of dozens of simultaneous immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions further undermined the petitioner's financial credibility.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO considered broader business factors under Sonegawa but found no evidence of significant growth, outstanding business reputation, or uncharacteristic expenditures. The presence of dozens of simultaneous immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions further undermined the petitioner's financial credibility.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_05_B5203; source_row=16062
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程工程师

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification requirements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification required a bachelor's degree in civil engineering, 60 months of experience as a structural engineer, and a Connecticut professional engineering license. The record contained multiple inconsistent employment dates across Forms 9089 (signed under penalty of perjury), Form G-325A, and employer letters, and the beneficiary failed to resolve these with independent objective evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification required a bachelor's degree in civil engineering, 60 months of experience as a structural engineer, and a Connecticut professional engineering license. The record contained multiple inconsistent employment dates across Forms 9089 (signed under penalty of perjury), Form G-325A, and employer letters, and the beneficiary failed to resolve these with independent objective evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_06_B5203; source_row=16064
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程工程师

审查的问题

other

Section 204(c) marriage fraud bar

证据为何得到认可

Under the correct substantial and probative evidence standard from Matter of Tawfik, the record supports a finding of marriage fraud. The petitioning spouse twice withdrew I-130 petitions with written statements that the beneficiary married her to remain in the U.S. legally, and the record contains numerous unresolved inconsistencies in the parties' statements about cohabitation.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Under the correct substantial and probative evidence standard from Matter of Tawfik, the record supports a finding of marriage fraud. The petitioning spouse twice withdrew I-130 petitions with written statements that the beneficiary married her to remain in the U.S. legally, and the record contains numerous unresolved inconsistencies in the parties' statements about cohabitation. The beneficiary failed to reconcile these inconsistencies with independent objective evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-03-18_06_B5203; source_row=16063
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评