leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
裁决如何说明
Counsel asserted criterion (viii) on appeal, but AAO did not separately address it, having found the minimum threshold met under criteria (i), (ii), and (iii).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel asserted criterion (viii) on appeal, but AAO did not separately address it, having found the minimum threshold met under criteria (i), (ii), and (iii).
AAO found the totality of evidence shows the petitioner has a career of acclaimed work in squash, has sustained national and international acclaim, and is among those at the very top of the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the totality of evidence shows the petitioner has a career of acclaimed work in squash, has sustained national and international acclaim, and is among those at the very top of the field.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
证据为何得到认可
Both the director and AAO found that the petitioner's evidence satisfied criterion (i) regarding lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the director and AAO found that the petitioner's evidence satisfied criterion (i) regarding lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
证据为何得到认可
On appeal, AAO found that the petitioner's evidence meets the published material criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii), reversing the director's finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
On appeal, AAO found that the petitioner's evidence meets the published material criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iii), reversing the director's finding.
Counsel asserted criterion (ix) on appeal, but AAO did not separately address it, having found the minimum threshold met under criteria (i), (ii), and (iii).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel asserted criterion (ix) on appeal, but AAO did not separately address it, having found the minimum threshold met under criteria (i), (ii), and (iii).
Counsel asserted criterion (v) on appeal, but AAO did not separately address it, having found the minimum threshold met under criteria (i), (ii), and (iii).
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel asserted criterion (v) on appeal, but AAO did not separately address it, having found the minimum threshold met under criteria (i), (ii), and (iii).
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The SUT certificate failed to establish qualifying selection criteria. The British Ecological Society letter submitted on appeal was determined to contain falsified information and therefore could not serve as credible evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The SUT certificate failed to establish qualifying selection criteria. The British Ecological Society letter submitted on appeal was determined to contain falsified information and therefore could not serve as credible evidence.
AAO found that the petitioner's net income was negative in 2009 (-$15,012) and 2010 (-$28,190), net current assets were also insufficient in both years, and wages actually paid to the beneficiary ($60,883 in 2009, $54,246 in 2010, $46,370 in 2011) were all below the proffered wage of $91,050. Officer compensation, even if fully redirected, would not have covered the gap.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's net income was negative in 2009 (-$15,012) and 2010 (-$28,190), net current assets were also insufficient in both years, and wages actually paid to the beneficiary ($60,883 in 2009, $54,246 in 2010, $46,370 in 2011) were all below the proffered wage of $91,050. Officer compensation, even if fully redirected, would not have covered the gap. The shareholder's personal assets cannot be attributed to the corporation. The totality of circumstances—declining business, insufficient gross receipts, and no industry reputation—confirmed inability to pay.