可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 21901–21910

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能学士

审查的问题

other

Wages paid to beneficiary equal to or exceeding proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The 2011 pay stubs did not cover the entire year, and the beneficiary's monthly salary of $7,083 was less than the proffered monthly wage of $8,200.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The 2011 pay stubs did not cover the entire year, and the beneficiary's monthly salary of $7,083 was less than the proffered monthly wage of $8,200.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=15972
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能学士

审查的问题

other

Net current assets sufficient to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The 2010 Form 1120S showed net current assets of only $4,456, far below the proffered annual wage of $98,405.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The 2010 Form 1120S showed net current assets of only $4,456, far below the proffered annual wage of $98,405.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=15974
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能学士

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay combined proffered wages for multiple I-140 petitions

AAO 为什么未被说服

USCIS records show the petitioner filed four additional I-140 petitions, requiring demonstration of combined ability to pay all proffered wages. The record failed to document priority dates, proffered wages, or disposition of those other petitions.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
USCIS records show the petitioner filed four additional I-140 petitions, requiring demonstration of combined ability to pay all proffered wages. The record failed to document priority dates, proffered wages, or disposition of those other petitions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=15975
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能学士

审查的问题

other

Net income sufficient to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The 2010 Form 1120S showed net income of only $4,621, far below the proffered wage. Unaudited financial statements were not acceptable because they were compiled rather than audited, and bank statements are not among the enumerated acceptable forms of evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The 2010 Form 1120S showed net income of only $4,621, far below the proffered wage. Unaudited financial statements were not acceptable because they were compiled rather than audited, and bank statements are not among the enumerated acceptable forms of evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=15973
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能学士

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification education requirements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO reviewed the AACRAO EDGE database and found that the beneficiary's degree is in architecture, not engineering, and that these are not in the same field. Because USCIS may not ignore a term of the labor certification, the beneficiary is unqualified for the offered position.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reviewed the AACRAO EDGE database and found that the beneficiary's degree is in architecture, not engineering, and that these are not in the same field. Because USCIS may not ignore a term of the labor certification, the beneficiary is unqualified for the offered position.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=15976
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他2,011 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The AAO affirmed the director's finding, noting that the petitioner's role as a reviewer and judge of international film entries and membership on an editorial board satisfied the plain language of the criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO affirmed the director's finding, noting that the petitioner's role as a reviewer and judge of international film entries and membership on an editorial board satisfied the plain language of the criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-28_01_B2203; source_row=15968
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Sufficiency of experience letter under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1)

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO raised this issue sua sponte on de novo review. The experience letter listed job title and technologies used but did not provide a specific description of duties performed as required by the regulation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO raised this issue sua sponte on de novo review. The experience letter listed job title and technologies used but did not provide a specific description of duties performed as required by the regulation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-28_03_B5203; source_row=15978
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the petitioner paid the beneficiary only $13,920 in 2011 (less than the $30,160 proffered wage) and had a net loss of -$5,542 in 2011 with only $19,600 in total revenue and no assets.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner paid the beneficiary only $13,920 in 2011 (less than the $30,160 proffered wage) and had a net loss of -$5,542 in 2011 with only $19,600 in total revenue and no assets. AAO rejected use of a line of credit (not a contractual obligation and not equivalent to cash), prorating the wage (no monthly income statements or pay stubs covering only the post-priority-date period were submitted), and shareholder personal assets (corporation is a separate legal entity). Totality of circumstances also weighed against the petitioner given consistent decline since 2008.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-28_05_B5203; source_row=15980
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner, as a third-party consultant, did not demonstrate a leading or critical role for the medical organizations as a whole. Evidence of attracting and maintaining clients does not establish that the petitioner's role was critical to the organizations. The medical organizations obtained their reputation independently of the petitioner. Furthermore, the regulation requires a role for organizations in the plural.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner, as a third-party consultant, did not demonstrate a leading or critical role for the medical organizations as a whole. Evidence of attracting and maintaining clients does not establish that the petitioner's role was critical to the organizations. The medical organizations obtained their reputation independently of the petitioner. Furthermore, the regulation requires a role for organizations in the plural.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_04_B2203; source_row=15963
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

The foreign-language documents lacked proper individual translator certifications and were thus not probative. The bare circulation numbers were insufficient to demonstrate that the publications constituted major media, as no comparative evidence was provided. The television appearance was not about the petitioner relating to her work.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The foreign-language documents lacked proper individual translator certifications and were thus not probative. The bare circulation numbers were insufficient to demonstrate that the publications constituted major media, as no comparative evidence was provided. The television appearance was not about the petitioner relating to her work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-02-27_04_B2203; source_row=15961
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评