可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 22091–22100

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Five years of progressive experience in the specialty by priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

The work experience letters document only approximately four years of experience following the award of the beneficiary's Indian bachelor's degree, falling short of the required five years by the April 5, 2010 priority date.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The work experience letters document only approximately four years of experience following the award of the beneficiary's Indian bachelor's degree, falling short of the required five years by the April 5, 2010 priority date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_15_B5203; source_row=15743
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Foreign equivalent degree (baccalaureate or above)

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO gave greater weight to EDGE/AACRAO peer-reviewed information over the submitted evaluations, concluding that the Indian M.S. is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluations were not peer-reviewed, did not address actual courses of study, and failed to substantiate the rationale behind credit assignments.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO gave greater weight to EDGE/AACRAO peer-reviewed information over the submitted evaluations, concluding that the Indian M.S. is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The submitted evaluations were not peer-reviewed, did not address actual courses of study, and failed to substantiate the rationale behind credit assignments.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_15_B5203; source_row=15742
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Whether the proffered position involves prohibited physician duties

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO agreed that the job duties in the labor certification describe tasks normally performed by a physician, that counsel's job clarification constituted an impermissible material change, and that the re-categorization of the position from biochemist to medical scientist was a further impermissible material change. The beneficiary does not qualify for admission as a practicing physician.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed that the job duties in the labor certification describe tasks normally performed by a physician, that counsel's job clarification constituted an impermissible material change, and that the re-categorization of the position from biochemist to medical scientist was a further impermissible material change. The beneficiary does not qualify for admission as a practicing physician.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_03_B5203; source_row=15728
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

specific identification of erroneous conclusion of law or fact

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner merely resubmitted the prior RFE-response language and did not identify any specific error in the director's denial.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner merely resubmitted the prior RFE-response language and did not identify any specific error in the director's denial.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_09_B5203; source_row=15738
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage from priority date forward

AAO 为什么未被说服

The beneficiary's W-2 wages fell short of the proffered wage every year. The petitioner's net income and net current assets were also insufficient to cover the deficiency in 2010, no 2011 tax return was filed, and no totality-of-circumstances factors paralleling Sonegawa were shown.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's W-2 wages fell short of the proffered wage every year. The petitioner's net income and net current assets were also insufficient to cover the deficiency in 2010, no 2011 tax return was filed, and no totality-of-circumstances factors paralleling Sonegawa were shown.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_17_B5203; source_row=15745
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

裁决如何说明

The AAO did not separately address this prong; the decision focused its analysis on whether the petitioner had shown a substantial impact greater than an available U.S. worker.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO did not separately address this prong; the decision focused its analysis on whether the petitioner had shown a substantial impact greater than an available U.S. worker.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_08_B5203; source_row=15735
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

裁决如何说明

The AAO did not separately address national scope as a distinct prong; the decision noted the record did not show the petitioner's work attracted any notice outside of Baltimore.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO did not separately address national scope as a distinct prong; the decision noted the record did not show the petitioner's work attracted any notice outside of Baltimore.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_08_B5203; source_row=15736
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification educational requirements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO determined that because the beneficiary's degree is from an unaccredited institution and therefore does not qualify as a U.S. master's degree, and because he has no foreign equivalent master's degree, he does not meet the educational requirement on the labor certification for the proffered position.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO determined that because the beneficiary's degree is from an unaccredited institution and therefore does not qualify as a U.S. master's degree, and because he has no foreign equivalent master's degree, he does not meet the educational requirement on the labor certification for the proffered position.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_18_B5203; source_row=15747
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner submitted only two pay stubs with dates in mid-2011 and no corporate tax return for 2011. It failed to establish Sonegawa-type factors that would permit a finding of ability to pay despite shortfalls in net income or net current assets, and thus could not demonstrate ability to pay the $104,458 proffered wage from the March 29, 2011 priority date.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner submitted only two pay stubs with dates in mid-2011 and no corporate tax return for 2011. It failed to establish Sonegawa-type factors that would permit a finding of ability to pay despite shortfalls in net income or net current assets, and thus could not demonstrate ability to pay the $104,458 proffered wage from the March 29, 2011 priority date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_04_B5203; source_row=15730
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The employment statements are internally contradictory and conflict with the beneficiary's own declarations on the labor certification, changing job duties, titles, and employment periods from one statement to the next.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The employment statements are internally contradictory and conflict with the beneficiary's own declarations on the labor certification, changing job duties, titles, and employment periods from one statement to the next. The affidavits constitute secondary evidence that fails to overcome the unavailability of primary documentation, and the description of work experience is repetitive and fails to establish the required progressive experience.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-29_04_B5203; source_row=15729
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评