可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 22191–22200

NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found the petitioner offered only speculation about future plans and the beneficiary had no demonstrated business experience prior to co-founding the petitioning company in 2003. Intentions and future plans do not suffice to show the past record of achievement required by NYSDOT.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the petitioner offered only speculation about future plans and the beneficiary had no demonstrated business experience prior to co-founding the petitioning company in 2003. Intentions and future plans do not suffice to show the past record of achievement required by NYSDOT.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15621
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

academic record

official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner did not explain how either the law degree or English education degree relates to the beneficiary's claimed area of exceptional ability in business.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not explain how either the law degree or English education degree relates to the beneficiary's claimed area of exceptional ability in business.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15623
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The corporate formation documents show the petitioner's existence but not recognition for achievements from peers, government, or professional organizations. The certificate from a partisan political organization was vague, did not reference business activities, and appeared to have been issued months after the filing date.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The corporate formation documents show the petitioner's existence but not recognition for achievements from peers, government, or professional organizations. The certificate from a partisan political organization was vague, did not reference business activities, and appeared to have been issued months after the filing date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15628
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

license or certification

license or certification for the profession or occupation

证据为何得到认可

At least some of the submitted licenses and certifications pertain to the beneficiary's intended work and satisfy the plain wording of the regulation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
At least some of the submitted licenses and certifications pertain to the beneficiary's intended work and satisfy the plain wording of the regulation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15625
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWten years experience未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

ten years experience

ten years full-time experience in the occupation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The employer letters showed experience as a teacher and secretary, not in the beneficiary's intended occupation as a chief executive. The letters did not show any employment experience in the beneficiary's intended occupation with the petitioning entity.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The employer letters showed experience as a teacher and secretary, not in the beneficiary's intended occupation as a chief executive. The letters did not show any employment experience in the beneficiary's intended occupation with the petitioning entity.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15624
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found the petitioner's claims of national/international scope were based on business arrangements with major corporations, not on the petitioner's own demonstrated national footprint, and the company had only two employees.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the petitioner's claims of national/international scope were based on business arrangements with major corporations, not on the petitioner's own demonstrated national footprint, and the company had only two employees.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15620
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO noted that assertions about the role of a notary public at best address only the substantial intrinsic merit prong but do not suffice to establish the full NYSDOT test.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO noted that assertions about the role of a notary public at best address only the substantial intrinsic merit prong but do not suffice to establish the full NYSDOT test.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-10_01_B5203; source_row=15619
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

The director had found this criterion met, but AAO withdrew that finding. AAO held that music performances by a violinist in an orchestra do not constitute 'display' of work at 'artistic exhibitions or showcases,' which is limited to the visual arts under longstanding interpretation upheld by federal court.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The director had found this criterion met, but AAO withdrew that finding. AAO held that music performances by a violinist in an orchestra do not constitute 'display' of work at 'artistic exhibitions or showcases,' which is limited to the visual arts under longstanding interpretation upheld by federal court.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-09_02_B2203; source_row=15606
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The director had found this criterion met, but AAO withdrew that finding. AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate that her roles as a violinist and section player were leading or critical to the orchestras, that the orchestras had a distinguished reputation relative to other orchestras, or that her later appointment as Assistant Concertmaster was in effect at the time of filing.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The director had found this criterion met, but AAO withdrew that finding. AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate that her roles as a violinist and section player were leading or critical to the orchestras, that the orchestras had a distinguished reputation relative to other orchestras, or that her later appointment as Assistant Concertmaster was in effect at the time of filing. Self-promotional website material and conclusory letters were insufficient.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-09_02_B2203; source_row=15607
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others in the same or allied field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner submitted contracts for private music lessons, master class clinician work, and letters from colleagues characterizing teaching as equivalent to judging. AAO held that teaching and master class instruction do not equate to formal participation as 'a judge' of the work of others, which implies a formal designation in a judging capacity.…

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner submitted contracts for private music lessons, master class clinician work, and letters from colleagues characterizing teaching as equivalent to judging. AAO held that teaching and master class instruction do not equate to formal participation as 'a judge' of the work of others, which implies a formal designation in a judging capacity. Student music instruction in a school setting does not satisfy the plain language requirement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2013-01-09_02_B2203; source_row=15605
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评