可追溯来源的裁决研究
从大量个案裁决理由中检索，再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。
本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录，而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误；标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率，也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。
10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定
当前显示 22371–22380
案件事实
审查的问题
published material about the alien
证据为何得到认可
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO affirmed the director's finding that the petitioner met this criterion.
案件事实
审查的问题
original contributions of major significance
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the letters were either complimentary but lacked specificity about field-wide impact, were vague and conclusory, or were solicited reviews; copyright registrations alone do not show impact; counsel's assertions about implementation were unsupported.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
AAO found the letters were either complimentary but lacked specificity about field-wide impact, were vague and conclusory, or were solicited reviews; copyright registrations alone do not show impact; counsel's assertions about implementation were unsupported.
案件事实
审查的问题
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
AAO was satisfied that the evidence regarding the petitioner's multimedia project 'Hello' met this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO was satisfied that the evidence regarding the petitioner's multimedia project 'Hello' met this criterion.
案件事实
审查的问题
Net income from federal tax returns
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's 2010 Form 1120 showed a net loss of $645,520.00, and no 2011 return was submitted, so net income could not establish ability to pay.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The petitioner's 2010 Form 1120 showed a net loss of $645,520.00, and no 2011 return was submitted, so net income could not establish ability to pay.
案件事实
审查的问题
Net current assets from tax returns
AAO 为什么未被说服
The 2010 tax return showed net current assets of $0.00, and no 2011 return was submitted, so net current assets could not establish ability to pay.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The 2010 tax return showed net current assets of $0.00, and no 2011 return was submitted, so net current assets could not establish ability to pay.
案件事实
审查的问题
Stock sale proceeds and bank statements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The bank statements did not identify the source of deposits; pre-July 29, 2011 deposits appeared to derive from the line of credit rather than a stock sale; post-sale deposits totaled only $544,858 leaving $466,142 unaccounted for; and bank account balances represent operating funds rather than assets sustainably available to pay wages. The petitioner also failed to submit an audited financial statement or 2011 tax return.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The bank statements did not identify the source of deposits; pre-July 29, 2011 deposits appeared to derive from the line of credit rather than a stock sale; post-sale deposits totaled only $544,858 leaving $466,142 unaccounted for; and bank account balances represent operating funds rather than assets sustainably available to pay wages. The petitioner also failed to submit an audited financial statement or 2011 tax return.
案件事实
审查的问题
Wages actually paid to beneficiary
AAO 为什么未被说服
The W-2 for 2010 showed $83,333.40 (a shortfall of $30,317.60) and paycheck stubs for 2011 showed $41,666.70 through August 31, 2011 (a shortfall of $71,984.30), so the petitioner did not pay the full proffered wage in either year.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The W-2 for 2010 showed $83,333.40 (a shortfall of $30,317.60) and paycheck stubs for 2011 showed $41,666.70 through August 31, 2011 (a shortfall of $71,984.30), so the petitioner did not pay the full proffered wage in either year.
案件事实
审查的问题
Totality of circumstances / Sonegawa factors
AAO 为什么未被说服
No evidence was presented of a sound business reputation, milestone achievements, uncharacteristic losses, or officer willingness to forego compensation, as required under the Sonegawa framework.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
No evidence was presented of a sound business reputation, milestone achievements, uncharacteristic losses, or officer willingness to forego compensation, as required under the Sonegawa framework.
案件事实
审查的问题
Lines of credit as supplemental evidence
AAO 为什么未被说服
USCIS will not augment net income or net current assets by adding credit limits or lines of credit, as these are commitments to loan rather than existing assets. The record lacked terms of the line of credit or evidence it was honored in the priority date year.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
USCIS will not augment net income or net current assets by adding credit limits or lines of credit, as these are commitments to loan rather than existing assets. The record lacked terms of the line of credit or evidence it was honored in the priority date year.
案件事实
审查的问题
ability to pay proffered wage from priority date
AAO 为什么未被说服
The beneficiary's W-2 wages were well below the proffered wage in 2008 ($50,000), 2009 ($40,000), and 2010 ($55,000). Net income on Schedule C was $2,664 in 2008 and $0 in 2009. Future contract revenues cannot establish past ability to pay. The petitioner also had multiple simultaneously pending immigrant petitions, further undermining the ability to pay all proffered wages.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The beneficiary's W-2 wages were well below the proffered wage in 2008 ($50,000), 2009 ($40,000), and 2010 ($55,000). Net income on Schedule C was $2,664 in 2008 and $0 in 2009. Future contract revenues cannot establish past ability to pay. The petitioner also had multiple simultaneously pending immigrant petitions, further undermining the ability to pay all proffered wages.