可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 22461–22470

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree qualification — academically appropriate degree for the proffered occupation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found the director's acceptance unsupported by the record. The petitioner's degrees are in business and marketing, which are not academically appropriate for domestic violence advocacy work. The petitioner's advocacy was unpaid volunteer work, not an 'occupation,' and she cannot use her marketing career to qualify for the classification while relying on advocacy for the waiver.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the director's acceptance unsupported by the record. The petitioner's degrees are in business and marketing, which are not academically appropriate for domestic violence advocacy work. The petitioner's advocacy was unpaid volunteer work, not an 'occupation,' and she cannot use her marketing career to qualify for the classification while relying on advocacy for the waiver.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_01_B5203; source_row=15285
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Beneficiary holds advanced degree or foreign equivalent at priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

Relying on EDGE, AAO concludes that the Indian Master of Commerce is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and the beneficiary did not accrue five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience before the January 29, 2007 priority date.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Relying on EDGE, AAO concludes that the Indian Master of Commerce is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and the beneficiary did not accrue five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience before the January 29, 2007 priority date.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_02_B5203; source_row=15290
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Labor certification job requirements correspond to an advanced degree

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO affirms that the labor certification permits combinations of lesser degrees, diplomas, certificates, training, and experience to substitute for a master's degree, which does not satisfy the regulatory definition of 'advanced degree' requiring a single degree with one-to-one equivalency.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirms that the labor certification permits combinations of lesser degrees, diplomas, certificates, training, and experience to substitute for a master's degree, which does not satisfy the regulatory definition of 'advanced degree' requiring a single degree with one-to-one equivalency.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_02_B5203; source_row=15289
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO affirms; the beneficiary has not established recent acclaim as an athlete nor sustained acclaim in coaching at a national level under AFM 22.2(i)(1)(C).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirms; the beneficiary has not established recent acclaim as an athlete nor sustained acclaim in coaching at a national level under AFM 22.2(i)(1)(C).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_01_B2203; source_row=15277
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO affirms the director's finding that the judging criterion is satisfied.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirms the director's finding that the judging criterion is satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_01_B2203; source_row=15280
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest served to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the witness letters focus on the petitioner's individual dedication but do not show broader influence in the field. The petitioner had not distinguished herself from other workers with the same minimum qualifications, and the record contained no concrete evidence of employment as an advocate or meaningful national-level impact.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the witness letters focus on the petitioner's individual dedication but do not show broader influence in the field. The petitioner had not distinguished herself from other workers with the same minimum qualifications, and the record contained no concrete evidence of employment as an advocate or meaningful national-level impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_01_B5203; source_row=15288
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

The AAO implicitly accepted, consistent with the director, that domestic violence advocacy has substantial intrinsic merit, though it was not dispositive given the failures on other prongs.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO implicitly accepted, consistent with the director, that domestic violence advocacy has substantial intrinsic merit, though it was not dispositive given the failures on other prongs.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_01_B5203; source_row=15286
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the petitioner's past work was confined to local organizations in and around San Francisco, her publications were in Malay (foreign to most Americans), and the argument that clients could relocate would render the national-scope test meaningless. There was no evidence that her future work would be broader in scope.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the petitioner's past work was confined to local organizations in and around San Francisco, her publications were in Malay (foreign to most Americans), and the argument that clients could relocate would render the national-scope test meaningless. There was no evidence that her future work would be broader in scope.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_01_B5203; source_row=15287
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Continuing ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date

证据为何得到认可

AAO finds the wages actually paid to the beneficiary in 2007 ($50,000) and the first nine months of 2008 ($48,500.01), combined with the petitioner's net income, suffice to demonstrate continuing ability to pay $59,000.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the wages actually paid to the beneficiary in 2007 ($50,000) and the first nine months of 2008 ($48,500.01), combined with the petitioner's net income, suffice to demonstrate continuing ability to pay $59,000.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-30_02_B5203; source_row=15291
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage from 2008 to the present

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the petitioner had not demonstrated continuing ability to pay from 2008 forward, and noted the director had not examined this issue. AAO also flagged that the petitioner has multiple simultaneously pending petitions and must show ability to pay all beneficiaries. Issue remanded for the director to address.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner had not demonstrated continuing ability to pay from 2008 forward, and noted the director had not examined this issue. AAO also flagged that the petitioner has multiple simultaneously pending petitions and must show ability to pay all beneficiaries. Issue remanded for the director to address.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-08-29_01_B5203; source_row=15276
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评