published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The submitted articles either did not mention the petitioner, only mentioned him in passing, lacked required date information, or lacked evidence that the publications qualified as major media. The regulation requires the published material to be 'about the alien.'
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted articles either did not mention the petitioner, only mentioned him in passing, lacked required date information, or lacked evidence that the publications qualified as major media. The regulation requires the published material to be 'about the alien.'
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
The cited event post-dated the petition's filing date so could not be considered. Additionally, the regulation requires exhibitions and showcases in the plural, and the petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence of more than one qualifying event.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The cited event post-dated the petition's filing date so could not be considered. Additionally, the regulation requires exhibitions and showcases in the plural, and the petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence of more than one qualifying event.
commercial successes in the performing arts as shown by box office receipts or record, cassette, compact disk, or video sales
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence of sales or receipts showing commercial success in the performing arts. The mere fact of having produced or directed a film is insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence of sales or receipts showing commercial success in the performing arts. The mere fact of having produced or directed a film is insufficient.
authorship of scholarly articles in the field in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The sole article submitted was an uncorrected proof with no confirmed publication date. Even if published, the regulation requires authorship of scholarly articles in the plural, so a single article is insufficient.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The sole article submitted was an uncorrected proof with no confirmed publication date. Even if published, the regulation requires authorship of scholarly articles in the plural, so a single article is insufficient.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
Evidence was not accompanied by proof that the prizes were nationally or internationally recognized; photographs and newspaper accounts were secondary evidence and the petitioner did not show primary evidence was unavailable.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Evidence was not accompanied by proof that the prizes were nationally or internationally recognized; photographs and newspaper accounts were secondary evidence and the petitioner did not show primary evidence was unavailable.
Although Esquire qualifies as major media, the article was not primarily about the beneficiary; remaining items either were not about him or did not establish the publication was a major trade publication or major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although Esquire qualifies as major media, the article was not primarily about the beneficiary; remaining items either were not about him or did not establish the publication was a major trade publication or major media.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The first title resembled an educational degree rather than association membership; Les Toques Blanches – Egypt membership requirements (chef of good standing) fall short of requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The first title resembled an educational degree rather than association membership; Les Toques Blanches – Egypt membership requirements (chef of good standing) fall short of requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.