可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 22641–22650

EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO finds the article in one publication was not about the petitioner; the DVD of TV programs was inaccessible and accompanying letter unsigned; circulation data from publishers was self-serving; and standardized letters calling Nepali papers 'class A' major media lacked objective independent rankings.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the article in one publication was not about the petitioner; the DVD of TV programs was inaccessible and accompanying letter unsigned; circulation data from publishers was self-serving; and standardized letters calling Nepali papers 'class A' major media lacked objective independent rankings.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_04_B2203; source_row=15053
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO affirmed that a U.S. baccalaureate generally requires four years of education per Matter of Shah, and that AACRAO EDGE confirms three-year Indian degrees are comparable to only three years of U.S. study. The submitted evaluations were found unpersuasive, and the combination of a three-year degree with technical diplomas cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO affirmed that a U.S. baccalaureate generally requires four years of education per Matter of Shah, and that AACRAO EDGE confirms three-year Indian degrees are comparable to only three years of U.S. study. The submitted evaluations were found unpersuasive, and the combination of a three-year degree with technical diplomas cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_01_B5203; source_row=15042
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that a three-year Indian bachelor's degree cannot be a foreign equivalent to a U.S. four-year baccalaureate, and that combining it with ICAI professional certification still does not produce a qualifying 'foreign equivalent degree' because the regulation requires an official college or university degree. The credential evaluations were rejected as methodologically deficient, and AACRAO EDGE data was preferred.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that a three-year Indian bachelor's degree cannot be a foreign equivalent to a U.S. four-year baccalaureate, and that combining it with ICAI professional certification still does not produce a qualifying 'foreign equivalent degree' because the regulation requires an official college or university degree. The credential evaluations were rejected as methodologically deficient, and AACRAO EDGE data was preferred.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_02_B5203; source_row=15048
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The AAO previously found the petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion and reaffirmed that finding on this motion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO previously found the petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion and reaffirmed that finding on this motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_06_B2203; source_row=15069
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The AAO previously found the petitioner minimally satisfied the judging criterion and reaffirmed that finding on this motion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO previously found the petitioner minimally satisfied the judging criterion and reaffirmed that finding on this motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_06_B2203; source_row=15068
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the petitioner's evidence satisfies the scholarly articles criterion under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vi).

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner's evidence satisfies the scholarly articles criterion under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vi).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_02_B2203; source_row=15046
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the petitioner's evidence satisfies the judging criterion under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv).

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner's evidence satisfies the judging criterion under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_02_B2203; source_row=15044
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the petitioner's evidence satisfies the original contributions of major significance criterion under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v).

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner's evidence satisfies the original contributions of major significance criterion under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_02_B2203; source_row=15045
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the petitioner demonstrated a level of expertise placing her at the very top of her field and sustained national acclaim as a cancer researcher.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the petitioner demonstrated a level of expertise placing her at the very top of her field and sustained national acclaim as a cancer researcher.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_02_B2203; source_row=15047
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

continuing to work in area of extraordinary ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

Petitioner did not submit a prospective employer letter, evidence of prearranged commitments, or a personal statement establishing intent to continue working in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not submit a prospective employer letter, evidence of prearranged commitments, or a personal statement establishing intent to continue working in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-30_05_B2203; source_row=15067
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评