AAO held that a three-year B.Com. plus ICAI membership is not a single foreign equivalent degree, and the ICAI is not an academic institution that can confer an official college or university degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that a three-year B.Com. plus ICAI membership is not a single foreign equivalent degree, and the ICAI is not an academic institution that can confer an official college or university degree.
The beneficiary's record as a top shock specialist in NASCAR demonstrates sustained national acclaim and places him among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's record as a top shock specialist in NASCAR demonstrates sustained national acclaim and places him among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
bachelor's degree or foreign educational equivalent per ETA Form 9089
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded that 'foreign equivalent' on a labor certification refers to a single foreign degree, not a combination of education and certifications, citing Snapnames.com.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded that 'foreign equivalent' on a labor certification refers to a single foreign degree, not a combination of education and certifications, citing Snapnames.com.
A three-year foreign bachelor's degree is not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate. A combination of a lesser degree plus a professional certification yields only an 'equivalent' rather than a 'foreign equivalent degree' as required, and ICAI membership is not a college or university degree. The WES evaluation lacked methodology, comparison to U.S. programs, and peer-reviewed support.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
A three-year foreign bachelor's degree is not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate. A combination of a lesser degree plus a professional certification yields only an 'equivalent' rather than a 'foreign equivalent degree' as required, and ICAI membership is not a college or university degree. The WES evaluation lacked methodology, comparison to U.S. programs, and peer-reviewed support.
AAO found insufficient evidence that petitioner authored the cited software, that downloads reflected influence by experts in the field, or that his citation level was indicative of major significance. Reference letters described the petitioner as capable but did not establish that his research had already impacted the field at the level of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found insufficient evidence that petitioner authored the cited software, that downloads reflected influence by experts in the field, or that his citation level was indicative of major significance. Reference letters described the petitioner as capable but did not establish that his research had already impacted the field at the level of major significance.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found none of the listed awards constitutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize for excellence: the NSF CAREER Award is a research grant designed to fund future research rather than honor past excellence; NABEC's award is age-restricted with no evidence of recognition beyond the issuing organization; the ASABE Select Paper Award lacks evidence on the nomination/selection process; and the remaining items lac…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found none of the listed awards constitutes a nationally or internationally recognized prize for excellence: the NSF CAREER Award is a research grant designed to fund future research rather than honor past excellence; NABEC's award is age-restricted with no evidence of recognition beyond the issuing organization; the ASABE Select Paper Award lacks evidence on the nomination/selection process; and the remaining items lack supporting evidence.
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
None of the articles was shown to be from a professional or major trade publication or other major media; no circulation or audience evidence was provided. Additionally, at least two articles were advertisements or announcements not about the petitioner relating to his work.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the articles was shown to be from a professional or major trade publication or other major media; no circulation or audience evidence was provided. Additionally, at least two articles were advertisements or announcements not about the petitioner relating to his work.