Evidence submitted on appeal after NOID notice was rejected. The bank account balance and real estate appraisal also post-dated the filing date. In any event, the documents failed to demonstrate high salary in relation to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Evidence submitted on appeal after NOID notice was rejected. The bank account balance and real estate appraisal also post-dated the filing date. In any event, the documents failed to demonstrate high salary in relation to others in the field.
Most submissions lacked required bibliographic elements (title, date, author). Articles about the petitioner's clients are not 'about the alien.' Translations were deficient. No evidence was provided that the publications qualified as major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Most submissions lacked required bibliographic elements (title, date, author). Articles about the petitioner's clients are not 'about the alien.' Translations were deficient. No evidence was provided that the publications qualified as major media.
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that evidence of the display of the beneficiary's designs in two or more fashion shows and/or competitions is sufficient to satisfy the plain language requirements of this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that evidence of the display of the beneficiary's designs in two or more fashion shows and/or competitions is sufficient to satisfy the plain language requirements of this criterion.
None of the website screenshots were primarily about the petitioner, lacked required author information, and were not demonstrated to be major media. The Southern Spirit article was about the petitioner but failed to establish the publication as major media. The book chapter was about football sponsorship generally, not about the petitioner.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the website screenshots were primarily about the petitioner, lacked required author information, and were not demonstrated to be major media. The Southern Spirit article was about the petitioner but failed to establish the publication as major media. The book chapter was about football sponsorship generally, not about the petitioner. Even if the Southern Spirit article qualified, the criterion requires published material in more than one publication (plural language).
The FIFA certificate submitted on appeal does not state the petitioner received the 'Volunteer of the Year' award; it merely acknowledges his contributions and enthusiasm. The petitioner also failed to demonstrate the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in his field. Additionally, the criterion requires more than one award (plural language), and only one was claimed.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The FIFA certificate submitted on appeal does not state the petitioner received the 'Volunteer of the Year' award; it merely acknowledges his contributions and enthusiasm. The petitioner also failed to demonstrate the award is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in his field. Additionally, the criterion requires more than one award (plural language), and only one was claimed.
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
There was no evidence showing the book and broadsheet equate to professional or major trade publications. Additionally, the materials were written for novice photographers and there was no evidence they were peer-reviewed, contained references to sources, or were otherwise considered scholarly articles.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
There was no evidence showing the book and broadsheet equate to professional or major trade publications. Additionally, the materials were written for novice photographers and there was no evidence they were peer-reviewed, contained references to sources, or were otherwise considered scholarly articles.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO declined to consider evidence raised for the first time on appeal after the director had flagged the deficiency in a NOID. Additionally, the letters did not state the petitioner held 'membership' in the museums, and no documentary evidence (e.g., bylaws) showed the institutions required outstanding achievements of members as judged by recognized experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to consider evidence raised for the first time on appeal after the director had flagged the deficiency in a NOID. Additionally, the letters did not state the petitioner held 'membership' in the museums, and no documentary evidence (e.g., bylaws) showed the institutions required outstanding achievements of members as judged by recognized experts.