可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 22811–22820

EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or other significantly high remuneration for services

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner did not establish the proper USD value of his Philippine Peso salary using a contemporaneous exchange rate. The salary comparison evidence was outdated (2007) and showed average CEO salary in the Philippines was actually higher than the petitioner's earnings. Even if the evidence showed above-average salary, that is insufficient to demonstrate a high salary under the regulation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not establish the proper USD value of his Philippine Peso salary using a contemporaneous exchange rate. The salary comparison evidence was outdated (2007) and showed average CEO salary in the Philippines was actually higher than the petitioner's earnings. Even if the evidence showed above-average salary, that is insufficient to demonstrate a high salary under the regulation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_02_B2203; source_row=14854
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner failed to show that any of the five companies he presided over had a distinguished reputation, as conducting business successfully does not establish distinguished reputation. Additionally, the petitioner's role with the rotary club was insufficiently documented, and the criterion requires qualifying roles for organizations in the plural.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner failed to show that any of the five companies he presided over had a distinguished reputation, as conducting business successfully does not establish distinguished reputation. Additionally, the petitioner's role with the rotary club was insufficiently documented, and the criterion requires qualifying roles for organizations in the plural.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_02_B2203; source_row=14853
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner failed to provide membership requirements or bylaws showing the organization requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts; the membership certificate was unsigned; being a board member of a rotary club does not equate to membership in an association; and the criterion requires membership in associations (plural), not just one.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner failed to provide membership requirements or bylaws showing the organization requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts; the membership certificate was unsigned; being a board member of a rotary club does not equate to membership in an association; and the criterion requires membership in associations (plural), not just one.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_02_B2203; source_row=14850
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aprocedural or other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

procedural or other

Required judicial proceeding statement (8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(1)(iii))

AAO 为什么未被说服

Prior counsel failed to submit the required statement about whether the AAO decision was or had been the subject of judicial proceedings, a deficiency that had already been flagged in the prior AAO decision.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Prior counsel failed to submit the required statement about whether the AAO decision was or had been the subject of judicial proceedings, a deficiency that had already been flagged in the prior AAO decision.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_03_B2203; source_row=14856
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aprocedural or other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

procedural or other

New facts requirement for motion to reopen (8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2))

AAO 为什么未被说服

The submitted evidence was not 'new': much of it post-dated the petition filing date and thus could not establish eligibility at time of filing, counsel's unsupported assertions carried no evidentiary weight, recommendation letters from U.S.-based individuals were not explained as previously unavailable, and counsel failed to explain why three newly claimed criteria were never raised before.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted evidence was not 'new': much of it post-dated the petition filing date and thus could not establish eligibility at time of filing, counsel's unsupported assertions carried no evidentiary weight, recommendation letters from U.S.-based individuals were not explained as previously unavailable, and counsel failed to explain why three newly claimed criteria were never raised before.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_03_B2203; source_row=14857
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The AAO credited the letter confirming the petitioner served as one of four final judges in April 2010 and found this satisfied the judging criterion, even though it was raised for the first time on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO credited the letter confirming the petitioner served as one of four final judges in April 2010 and found this satisfied the judging criterion, even though it was raised for the first time on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=14844
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach final merits because the petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three qualifying criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach final merits because the petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three qualifying criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=14847
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

The AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner met the display criterion, noting that the director had in fact already found this criterion satisfied.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner met the display criterion, noting that the director had in fact already found this criterion satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=14846
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

裁决如何说明

Although counsel initially asserted this criterion when filing the petition, counsel did not continue the assertion in response to the NOID or on appeal, so the AAO concluded the issue was abandoned.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although counsel initially asserted this criterion when filing the petition, counsel did not continue the assertion in response to the NOID or on appeal, so the AAO concluded the issue was abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_02_B2203; source_row=14852
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner provided no objective and independent evidence about the Woman magazine's reputation, readership, or geographic reach. Even if qualifying, the criterion requires publications in the plural. Evidence of other articles was unavailable and the petitioner's CV was insufficient to establish their publication.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner provided no objective and independent evidence about the Woman magazine's reputation, readership, or geographic reach. Even if qualifying, the criterion requires publications in the plural. Evidence of other articles was unavailable and the petitioner's CV was insufficient to establish their publication.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-07-11_02_B2203; source_row=14851
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评