The petitioner did not raise the leading or critical role criterion on appeal in counsel's 25-page brief, so the AAO concluded this issue was abandoned.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not raise the leading or critical role criterion on appeal in counsel's 25-page brief, so the AAO concluded this issue was abandoned.
The AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner met this criterion based on his appointment as a judge for national-level grain industry competitions.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner met this criterion based on his appointment as a judge for national-level grain industry competitions.
ability to pay proffered wage / realistic job offer
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO examined wages paid, net income, and net current assets and found each insufficient. Petitioner's replacement-worker theory was unsupported by documentation. No Sonegawa-type uncharacteristic circumstances were shown.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO examined wages paid, net income, and net current assets and found each insufficient. Petitioner's replacement-worker theory was unsupported by documentation. No Sonegawa-type uncharacteristic circumstances were shown.
The petitioner paid the beneficiary below the proffered wage every year, had negative net income every year, and had zero net current assets every year on its tax returns. Members' personal assets cannot be attributed to the LLC. Bank statements are not among the enumerated forms of evidence and cannot show sustainable ability to pay.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner paid the beneficiary below the proffered wage every year, had negative net income every year, and had zero net current assets every year on its tax returns. Members' personal assets cannot be attributed to the LLC. Bank statements are not among the enumerated forms of evidence and cannot show sustainable ability to pay. The Masonry Masters argument was inapplicable because counsel did not show any difference between the proffered and prevailing wage.
AACRAO EDGE indicates the Indian master's degree is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a U.S. master's degree. The credentials evaluator did not adequately explain her methodology. Without a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level, the beneficiary would need a baccalaureate equivalent plus five years of progressive experience, which is not established in the record.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AACRAO EDGE indicates the Indian master's degree is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a U.S. master's degree. The credentials evaluator did not adequately explain her methodology. Without a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level, the beneficiary would need a baccalaureate equivalent plus five years of progressive experience, which is not established in the record.
The labor certification required a degree in computer science or engineering. The beneficiary's degrees are in computer applications, which AAO found to be a different field of study. This was an additional ground of ineligibility raised by AAO on appeal, not addressed by the director.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification required a degree in computer science or engineering. The beneficiary's degrees are in computer applications, which AAO found to be a different field of study. This was an additional ground of ineligibility raised by AAO on appeal, not addressed by the director.
The beneficiary was paid $25,000 in 2006 and $60,000 in 2007, both well below the $90,000 proffered wage. Net income was negative in both years and net current assets were zero. Stock options, bank statements, unaudited financials, and projected income arguments were all rejected. Under the Sonegawa totality analysis, the petitioner's short business history and consistent heavy losses precluded a finding of ability to pay.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary was paid $25,000 in 2006 and $60,000 in 2007, both well below the $90,000 proffered wage. Net income was negative in both years and net current assets were zero. Stock options, bank statements, unaudited financials, and projected income arguments were all rejected. Under the Sonegawa totality analysis, the petitioner's short business history and consistent heavy losses precluded a finding of ability to pay.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
证据为何得到认可
AAO credited the petitioner's role as former General Manager of the France-Israel Chamber of Commerce and CEO of two companies, one selected by Inc. as among the fastest-growing private companies in the U.S.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO credited the petitioner's role as former General Manager of the France-Israel Chamber of Commerce and CEO of two companies, one selected by Inc. as among the fastest-growing private companies in the U.S.
AAO found this criterion satisfied based on patents and corroborated reference letters from independent experts detailing the petitioner's specific contributions and their influence on the field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found this criterion satisfied based on patents and corroborated reference letters from independent experts detailing the petitioner's specific contributions and their influence on the field.