AAO concluded the petitioner demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of the business field, contrary to the director's determination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the petitioner demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of the business field, contrary to the director's determination.
Effect of Kellogg language on advanced-degree qualification
证据为何得到认可
AAO interpreted the Kellogg language as not allowing acceptance of lesser qualifications than the stated primary and alternative requirements; therefore the position remains qualifying for advanced-degree classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO interpreted the Kellogg language as not allowing acceptance of lesser qualifications than the stated primary and alternative requirements; therefore the position remains qualifying for advanced-degree classification.
AAO found the principal supporting letter to be fraudulent, found no evidence anyone other than the petitioner practiced her style, and noted the regulation requires contributions in the plural.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the principal supporting letter to be fraudulent, found no evidence anyone other than the petitioner practiced her style, and noted the regulation requires contributions in the plural.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the book had not been published as of filing, the newspaper paragraphs were about a competition rather than the petitioner and contained inconsistent/fraudulent content, the magazine article was published after filing and lacked evidence of major media status, and translations were uncertified.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the book had not been published as of filing, the newspaper paragraphs were about a competition rather than the petitioner and contained inconsistent/fraudulent content, the magazine article was published after filing and lacked evidence of major media status, and translations were uncertified.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found no evidence of the membership selection criteria for any of the associations, noted that an appointment to a committee is not membership, and rejected counsel's unsupported assertions about the associations' selectivity.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found no evidence of the membership selection criteria for any of the associations, noted that an appointment to a committee is not membership, and rejected counsel's unsupported assertions about the associations' selectivity.
The letters from coaches do not constitute comparable evidence because comparable evidence is unavailable where the standard criteria apply. Coaching students is not the same as formally judging, and there is no documentary evidence (judging slips, event programs, judge credentials) of the petitioner's participation as a judge.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters from coaches do not constitute comparable evidence because comparable evidence is unavailable where the standard criteria apply. Coaching students is not the same as formally judging, and there is no documentary evidence (judging slips, event programs, judge credentials) of the petitioner's participation as a judge.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
Awards earned as a competitor cannot be considered because the petitioner's field is coaching. Awards won by the petitioner's students do not satisfy the plain language requirement that the petitioner received qualifying awards. The record contains no evidence of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in coaching.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Awards earned as a competitor cannot be considered because the petitioner's field is coaching. Awards won by the petitioner's students do not satisfy the plain language requirement that the petitioner received qualifying awards. The record contains no evidence of nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in coaching.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The record shows the petitioner performs a leading or critical role for his current employer, but there is no documentary evidence that the current employer has a distinguished reputation. No letters from former employers were provided, so prior roles cannot be assessed. Additionally, the plural language of the regulation requires evidence of a critical role for more than one distinguished organization.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record shows the petitioner performs a leading or critical role for his current employer, but there is no documentary evidence that the current employer has a distinguished reputation. No letters from former employers were provided, so prior roles cannot be assessed. Additionally, the plural language of the regulation requires evidence of a critical role for more than one distinguished organization.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's membership on the Soviet National Fencing Team relates to his career as a competitor, not as a coach. Additionally, the regulation's plural language requires membership in more than one qualifying association, and no waiver of that requirement exists.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's membership on the Soviet National Fencing Team relates to his career as a competitor, not as a coach. Additionally, the regulation's plural language requires membership in more than one qualifying association, and no waiver of that requirement exists.