Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner was listed as one of over 200 performers at the UMC and WMC, with no evidence distinguishing his role as leading or critical. Letters from Mean-Dream and WHL did not establish a leading or critical role, and no independent evidence demonstrated the distinguished reputation of these organizations. Additionally, conferences and festivals may not qualify as 'organizations or establishments' under the regulation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner was listed as one of over 200 performers at the UMC and WMC, with no evidence distinguishing his role as leading or critical. Letters from Mean-Dream and WHL did not establish a leading or critical role, and no independent evidence demonstrated the distinguished reputation of these organizations. Additionally, conferences and festivals may not qualify as 'organizations or establishments' under the regulation.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Several articles were not primarily about the petitioner or lacked required title/date/author information; no evidence the regional publications qualify as major media; appellate articles post-date the filing date.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Several articles were not primarily about the petitioner or lacked required title/date/author information; no evidence the regional publications qualify as major media; appellate articles post-date the filing date.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
No evidence of national or international recognition of the awards; new certificates submitted on appeal post-date the filing date and lacked certified translations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
No evidence of national or international recognition of the awards; new certificates submitted on appeal post-date the filing date and lacked certified translations.
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
No evidence the BAA or VAVA have a distinguished reputation, no organizational chart, and no showing the petitioner's roles differentiated her from other members or constituted a leading or critical role.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
No evidence the BAA or VAVA have a distinguished reputation, no organizational chart, and no showing the petitioner's roles differentiated her from other members or constituted a leading or critical role.
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
There is no evidence that BAA or VAVA have a distinguished reputation, and no evidence (e.g., organizational charts) showing the petitioner's role was leading or critical relative to other members or senior leadership.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
There is no evidence that BAA or VAVA have a distinguished reputation, and no evidence (e.g., organizational charts) showing the petitioner's role was leading or critical relative to other members or senior leadership.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Some articles were not primarily about the petitioner, others lacked required author/date/publication information, and there was no objective evidence that the publications qualified as major media. Articles post-dating the filing date could not be considered.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Some articles were not primarily about the petitioner, others lacked required author/date/publication information, and there was no objective evidence that the publications qualified as major media. Articles post-dating the filing date could not be considered.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
No documentary evidence such as bylaws or rules of admission was submitted to show that VAVA or BAA require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
No documentary evidence such as bylaws or rules of admission was submitted to show that VAVA or BAA require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
There is no evidence of national or international recognition of the awards, the foreign-language certificates lacked certified translations, and certain certificates post-dated the filing date.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
There is no evidence of national or international recognition of the awards, the foreign-language certificates lacked certified translations, and certain certificates post-dated the filing date.
advanced degree or foreign equivalent qualification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO disagreed with the director's finding, noting that while the petitioner submitted translated copies of two Argentine diplomas, she did not submit a credential evaluation or other evidence establishing that these foreign degrees are equivalent to a U.S. advanced degree. The translation of the 1997 diploma also appeared to be in error.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO disagreed with the director's finding, noting that while the petitioner submitted translated copies of two Argentine diplomas, she did not submit a credential evaluation or other evidence establishing that these foreign degrees are equivalent to a U.S. advanced degree. The translation of the 1997 diploma also appeared to be in error.