AAO found that while the petitioner showed evidence of original compositions, he did not show they constituted contributions of major significance. One composition was for a breastfeeding awareness campaign rather than for musical merit; evidence of performance was limited and unsubstantiated; reference letters were conclusory; and the regulation requires contributions in the plural.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the petitioner showed evidence of original compositions, he did not show they constituted contributions of major significance. One composition was for a breastfeeding awareness campaign rather than for musical merit; evidence of performance was limited and unsubstantiated; reference letters were conclusory; and the regulation requires contributions in the plural.
Licensing agreements are not an appropriate measure under this criterion; only sales volume (box office receipts, record/CD sales) qualifies. Airplay chart evidence does not demonstrate commercial success through sales volume. The petitioner failed to provide evidence of record or compact disc sales.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Licensing agreements are not an appropriate measure under this criterion; only sales volume (box office receipts, record/CD sales) qualifies. Airplay chart evidence does not demonstrate commercial success through sales volume. The petitioner failed to provide evidence of record or compact disc sales.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Billboard article was not about the petitioner by name but about the band and lacked a publication date. Magazine coverage did not establish qualifying circulation. Internet posting alone does not make a publication 'major media.' The BBC letter lacked corroboration. Cross Rhythms did not establish circulation qualifying it as major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Billboard article was not about the petitioner by name but about the band and lacked a publication date. Magazine coverage did not establish qualifying circulation. Internet posting alone does not make a publication 'major media.' The BBC letter lacked corroboration. Cross Rhythms did not establish circulation qualifying it as major media.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The single ISC award lacked independent evidence of national or international recognition, and the plain language requires 'awards' in the plural. Self-promotional material from the ISC website and a partial press release were insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The single ISC award lacked independent evidence of national or international recognition, and the plain language requires 'awards' in the plural. Self-promotional material from the ISC website and a partial press release were insufficient.
The AAO found the director erred because the petitioner failed to submit circulation or distribution data demonstrating the publications qualify as major media with significant national or international distribution.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the director erred because the petitioner failed to submit circulation or distribution data demonstrating the publications qualify as major media with significant national or international distribution.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
While the record showed the beneficiary performed in a leading or critical role for the petitioner, the petitioner failed to demonstrate a 'distinguished reputation.' Furthermore, the plain language of the criterion requires performance in a leading or critical role for more than one organization or establishment (plural).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While the record showed the beneficiary performed in a leading or critical role for the petitioner, the petitioner failed to demonstrate a 'distinguished reputation.' Furthermore, the plain language of the criterion requires performance in a leading or critical role for more than one organization or establishment (plural).
The unpublished biography cannot be considered because eligibility must be established at the time of filing. Additionally, counsel did not explain how the biography would constitute a 'scholarly' article relating to charity fundraising.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The unpublished biography cannot be considered because eligibility must be established at the time of filing. Additionally, counsel did not explain how the biography would constitute a 'scholarly' article relating to charity fundraising.
The AAO declined to consider rock and roll memorabilia experience as unrelated to the beneficiary's claimed extraordinary ability as Executive Director for a drunk driving charity, and counsel offered no explanation for why these achievements constitute comparable evidence of judging other charity executives.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to consider rock and roll memorabilia experience as unrelated to the beneficiary's claimed extraordinary ability as Executive Director for a drunk driving charity, and counsel offered no explanation for why these achievements constitute comparable evidence of judging other charity executives.
AAO disagreed with the director and found that evidence showing the petitioner's compositions were performed at events constitutes display at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the director and found that evidence showing the petitioner's compositions were performed at events constitutes display at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
AAO found that although AGI exceeded the proffered wage in some years, the household expense statements were inconsistent and understated (e.g., medical, property tax, and state tax figures on the household expense statement differed from Schedule A figures), 2010 income documentation was absent, the petitioner did not account for simultaneously pending petitions requiring ability to pay multiple beneficiaries, and future i…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that although AGI exceeded the proffered wage in some years, the household expense statements were inconsistent and understated (e.g., medical, property tax, and state tax figures on the household expense statement differed from Schedule A figures), 2010 income documentation was absent, the petitioner did not account for simultaneously pending petitions requiring ability to pay multiple beneficiaries, and future income projections were legally insufficient to establish ability to pay.