可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 23041–23050

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

meets labor certification educational requirement

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification plainly requires a master's degree or foreign equivalent. Since the Diplome d'Ingenieur is equivalent only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, the beneficiary does not meet the stated educational requirement for the proffered position.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification plainly requires a master's degree or foreign equivalent. Since the Diplome d'Ingenieur is equivalent only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, the beneficiary does not meet the stated educational requirement for the proffered position.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_02_B5203; source_row=14568
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Line of credit as evidence of ability to pay

AAO 为什么未被说服

USCIS will not augment net income or net current assets by adding a line of credit, which is merely an unenforceable commitment to loan rather than existing funds, and comparable to a credit card limit rather than cash.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
USCIS will not augment net income or net current assets by adding a line of credit, which is merely an unenforceable commitment to loan rather than existing funds, and comparable to a credit card limit rather than cash.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_05_B5203; source_row=14573
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Net income sufficient to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's net income on Line 28 of Form 1120 was $29,473 in 2006 and $0 in 2007, both below the proffered wage of $74,797.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's net income on Line 28 of Form 1120 was $29,473 in 2006 and $0 in 2007, both below the proffered wage of $74,797.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_05_B5203; source_row=14571
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Totality of business circumstances under Matter of Sonegawa

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although the petitioner has been in business since 2001, it did not demonstrate a pattern of significant growth, an uncharacteristic business loss, a sound industry reputation, or milestone achievements comparable to the Sonegawa petitioner, and simultaneous pending petitions further undermined a realistic-job-offer finding.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the petitioner has been in business since 2001, it did not demonstrate a pattern of significant growth, an uncharacteristic business loss, a sound industry reputation, or milestone achievements comparable to the Sonegawa petitioner, and simultaneous pending petitions further undermined a realistic-job-offer finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_05_B5203; source_row=14574
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Net current assets sufficient to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

Net current assets were $56,648 in 2006 (below the proffered wage) and $374,326 in 2007, but the 2007 figure was diminished by the petitioner's multiple simultaneously pending I-140 and I-129 petitions, which required it to demonstrate ability to pay all beneficiaries' wages.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Net current assets were $56,648 in 2006 (below the proffered wage) and $374,326 in 2007, but the 2007 figure was diminished by the petitioner's multiple simultaneously pending I-140 and I-129 petitions, which required it to demonstrate ability to pay all beneficiaries' wages.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_05_B5203; source_row=14572
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets labor certification job requirements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The beneficiary lacks the required bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent, and the record shows only about 8 years of laboratory management experience rather than the 10 years required, with some foreign experience not described as managerial. The petitioner's request to reclassify as EB-3 on appeal was rejected as an impermissible material change to the petition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary lacks the required bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent, and the record shows only about 8 years of laboratory management experience rather than the 10 years required, with some foreign experience not described as managerial. The petitioner's request to reclassify as EB-3 on appeal was rejected as an impermissible material change to the petition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_01_B5203; source_row=14566
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary meets minimum education requirement on labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AACRAO EDGE indicates the beneficiary's Indian three-year BA is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. university study, and the Indian MA is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree—not a U.S. master's degree. The submitted evaluations conflict with EDGE, lack explanation of credit-hour calculations, and are not peer-reviewed.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AACRAO EDGE indicates the beneficiary's Indian three-year BA is comparable to only two to three years of U.S. university study, and the Indian MA is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree—not a U.S. master's degree. The submitted evaluations conflict with EDGE, lack explanation of credit-hour calculations, and are not peer-reviewed. Because the beneficiary does not have a full four-year foreign equivalent baccalaureate, her Indian MA cannot be treated as equivalent to a U.S. master's degree, and she therefore does not meet the labor certification's minimum education requirement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_06_B5203; source_row=14575
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

beneficiary meets minimum education stated on labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

Because Part H-8 disallowed alternate combinations and the beneficiary's foreign education is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's, the beneficiary does not satisfy the labor certification's master's-degree requirement.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because Part H-8 disallowed alternate combinations and the beneficiary's foreign education is comparable only to a U.S. bachelor's, the beneficiary does not satisfy the labor certification's master's-degree requirement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-06_04_B5203; source_row=14570
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

other

ability to pay the proffered wage

裁决如何说明

AAO does not reach the ultimate ability-to-pay question; it withdraws the denial because the director relied on evidence predating the priority date and remands for development of post-priority-date evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not reach the ultimate ability-to-pay question; it withdraws the denial because the director relied on evidence predating the priority date and remands for development of post-priority-date evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-05_01_B5203; source_row=14563
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach a substantive ability-to-pay conclusion; it withdrew the denial and remanded for development of compliant evidence (tax returns, audited financial statements, or annual reports for 2009-2011).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach a substantive ability-to-pay conclusion; it withdrew the denial and remanded for development of compliant evidence (tax returns, audited financial statements, or annual reports for 2009-2011).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-06-05_02_B5203; source_row=14564
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评