可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 23061–23070

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Bank statements as evidence of ability to pay

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO rejected reliance on bank statements because they are not among the three types of evidence enumerated in 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), they only show account balances on a given date rather than sustainable ability to pay, and the petitioner did not demonstrate that the funds reflected additional available funds beyond those already captured in the tax returns.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected reliance on bank statements because they are not among the three types of evidence enumerated in 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2), they only show account balances on a given date rather than sustainable ability to pay, and the petitioner did not demonstrate that the funds reflected additional available funds beyond those already captured in the tax returns.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_12_B5203; source_row=14555
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Net income sufficient to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's Form 1120 for 2008 and 2009 both showed net income of $0.00, which is insufficient to pay the proffered wage of $123,323.00 per year.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's Form 1120 for 2008 and 2009 both showed net income of $0.00, which is insufficient to pay the proffered wage of $123,323.00 per year.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_12_B5203; source_row=14553
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Totality of circumstances / Matter of Sonegawa analysis

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO applied the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis but found no facts paralleling the favorable circumstances in that case. The petitioner failed to show any uncharacteristically difficult period, and its gross receipts were declining over the four years on record, suggesting a business in decline rather than temporary hardship.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO applied the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis but found no facts paralleling the favorable circumstances in that case. The petitioner failed to show any uncharacteristically difficult period, and its gross receipts were declining over the four years on record, suggesting a business in decline rather than temporary hardship.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_12_B5203; source_row=14557
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Foregone officer compensation as ability to pay

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found it not credible that shareholders would sacrifice all their income to pay the proffered wage, and even if all three shareholders who submitted statements did so, the total would still be insufficient for 2008. Additionally, shareholder personal assets cannot be attributed to the petitioning corporation as a separate legal entity.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found it not credible that shareholders would sacrifice all their income to pay the proffered wage, and even if all three shareholders who submitted statements did so, the total would still be insufficient for 2008. Additionally, shareholder personal assets cannot be attributed to the petitioning corporation as a separate legal entity.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_12_B5203; source_row=14556
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

Net current assets sufficient to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

In 2008, the petitioner did not have sufficient net current assets to pay the proffered wage, as shown on Schedule L of the Form 1120.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
In 2008, the petitioner did not have sufficient net current assets to pay the proffered wage, as shown on Schedule L of the Form 1120.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_12_B5203; source_row=14554
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

other

Sufficient net income to cover proffered wage shortfall

AAO 为什么未被说服

Review of the petitioner's net income figures from its corporate tax returns (Lines 28 of Form 1120) for 2007, 2008, and 2011 showed they were insufficient to cover the difference between wages paid and the proffered wage.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Review of the petitioner's net income figures from its corporate tax returns (Lines 28 of Form 1120) for 2007, 2008, and 2011 showed they were insufficient to cover the difference between wages paid and the proffered wage.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_10_B5203; source_row=14546
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

other

Overall business magnitude under Matter of Sonegawa

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although the petitioner had been in business since 1998, it submitted no evidence of an uncharacteristic business loss explaining the shortfall, no evidence of a sound or outstanding business reputation, and no evidence of historical growth or milestone achievements, so the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis did not establish ability to pay.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the petitioner had been in business since 1998, it submitted no evidence of an uncharacteristic business loss explaining the shortfall, no evidence of a sound or outstanding business reputation, and no evidence of historical growth or milestone achievements, so the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis did not establish ability to pay.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_10_B5203; source_row=14549
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

other

Officers' compensation as discretionary funding source

AAO 为什么未被说服

While officers' compensation can in principle be treated as a discretionary source of funds, the record lacked substantive documentation showing the officers could or would sacrifice their own wages, and counsel's unsupported assertions did not suffice as evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While officers' compensation can in principle be treated as a discretionary source of funds, the record lacked substantive documentation showing the officers could or would sacrifice their own wages, and counsel's unsupported assertions did not suffice as evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_10_B5203; source_row=14548
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

other

Beneficiary wages paid at or above proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

The beneficiary was paid the full proffered wage in 2009 and 2010 but was paid less than the proffered wage in 2007, 2008, and 2011, so this method did not establish ability to pay for all required years.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary was paid the full proffered wage in 2009 and 2010 but was paid less than the proffered wage in 2007, 2008, and 2011, so this method did not establish ability to pay for all required years.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_10_B5203; source_row=14545
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

other

Sufficient net current assets to cover proffered wage shortfall

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's end-of-year net current assets, drawn from Schedule L of its corporate tax returns, were insufficient to pay the proffered wage shortfall in 2007, 2008, and 2011.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's end-of-year net current assets, drawn from Schedule L of its corporate tax returns, were insufficient to pay the proffered wage shortfall in 2007, 2008, and 2011.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-05-30_10_B5203; source_row=14547
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评