The AAO did not separately address the first NYSDOT prong of substantial intrinsic merit, focusing its analysis on national scope and the third prong regarding benefit over a U.S. worker.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO did not separately address the first NYSDOT prong of substantial intrinsic merit, focusing its analysis on national scope and the third prong regarding benefit over a U.S. worker.
The AAO agreed with counsel that the petitioner's publication in nationally circulated journals and presentations at various locations gave his work national scope, disagreeing with the director on this prong.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with counsel that the petitioner's publication in nationally circulated journals and presentations at various locations gave his work national scope, disagreeing with the director on this prong.
The AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the petitioner's work for the Red Cross and federal entities had a national effect rather than strictly local applications.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the petitioner's work for the Red Cross and federal entities had a national effect rather than strictly local applications.
AAO found net income and net current assets in the priority year (2008) and the prior year (2007) insufficient to cover the proffered wage. Bank statements are not among the enumerated forms of evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2) and do not demonstrate sustainable ability to pay. Payment of wages to other employees does not establish ability to pay the beneficiary.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found net income and net current assets in the priority year (2008) and the prior year (2007) insufficient to cover the proffered wage. Bank statements are not among the enumerated forms of evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2) and do not demonstrate sustainable ability to pay. Payment of wages to other employees does not establish ability to pay the beneficiary. The totality of circumstances did not establish ability to pay, as the business was declining rather than growing.
bona fide intent to enter employer/employee relationship
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO independently found, beyond the director's decision, that it is not credible that the beneficiary—who has owned and operated his own construction business since 2000—would accept full-time employment with the petitioner. USCIS may reject facts stated in a petition it does not believe to be true.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently found, beyond the director's decision, that it is not credible that the beneficiary—who has owned and operated his own construction business since 2000—would accept full-time employment with the petitioner. USCIS may reject facts stated in a petition it does not believe to be true.
AAO agreed that a ranking alone is not an award or prize, but found sufficient documentary evidence in the record — including two Challenger titles — to determine that the beneficiary satisfied this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that a ranking alone is not an award or prize, but found sufficient documentary evidence in the record — including two Challenger titles — to determine that the beneficiary satisfied this criterion.
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the antecedent requirement of qualifying evidence under at least three criteria.
Because the beneficiary's foreign degrees do not equate to a U.S. master's degree, he does not satisfy the labor certification's requirement of a master's degree in Computer Science or Engineering, and the petition cannot be approved.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the beneficiary's foreign degrees do not equate to a U.S. master's degree, he does not satisfy the labor certification's requirement of a master's degree in Computer Science or Engineering, and the petition cannot be approved.