commanding a salary demonstrating exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's salary evidence, including pay records, a complimentary employer letter, and third-party salary reports from payscale.com and salary explorer, failed to demonstrate that her remuneration was indicative of exceptional ability relative to others working in her field. The salary comparison data was based on different job titles, unclear geographic coverage, or did not address her specific role.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's salary evidence, including pay records, a complimentary employer letter, and third-party salary reports from payscale.com and salary explorer, failed to demonstrate that her remuneration was indicative of exceptional ability relative to others working in her field. The salary comparison data was based on different job titles, unclear geographic coverage, or did not address her specific role.
The Petitioner failed to show a record of success or progress in advancing his own proposed entrepreneurial endeavor as of the January 2021 filing date. Evidence of D-P-C-'s research funding, the co-authored manuscript, the invention disclosure assigning rights to their employer, and the provisional patent application all either related to D-P-C-'s work rather than the Petitioner's endeavor, or post-dated the filing and cou…
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to show a record of success or progress in advancing his own proposed entrepreneurial endeavor as of the January 2021 filing date. Evidence of D-P-C-'s research funding, the co-authored manuscript, the invention disclosure assigning rights to their employer, and the provisional patent application all either related to D-P-C-'s work rather than the Petitioner's endeavor, or post-dated the filing and could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
The AAO found that the industry reports and discussion of sustainable techniques addressed the importance of the field rather than the specific proposed endeavor, and that the business plan's projection of 17 full-time employees over five years and a $50,000 initial investment from a partner did not sufficiently demonstrate national or global implications or significant potential to employ U.S.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the industry reports and discussion of sustainable techniques addressed the importance of the field rather than the specific proposed endeavor, and that the business plan's projection of 17 full-time employees over five years and a $50,000 initial investment from a partner did not sufficiently demonstrate national or global implications or significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects.
published material about the petitioner in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the Petitioner's appeal letter did not address the Director's specific adverse findings about the publications' limited reach and demise, and therefore the Petitioner failed to overcome the Director's determination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's appeal letter did not address the Director's specific adverse findings about the publications' limited reach and demise, and therefore the Petitioner failed to overcome the Director's determination.
Because the Petitioner could not satisfy three criteria even if criterion (iv) were resolved in his favor, AAO reserved this issue as unnecessary to reach.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner could not satisfy three criteria even if criterion (iv) were resolved in his favor, AAO reserved this issue as unnecessary to reach.