display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
This criterion applies to artists, not athletes. Comparable evidence was unavailable because the standard criteria readily apply to the petitioner's occupation. Even accepting comparable evidence, the performances of coached athletes are not a display of the coach's work in a comparable sense to artistic exhibitions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
This criterion applies to artists, not athletes. Comparable evidence was unavailable because the standard criteria readily apply to the petitioner's occupation. Even accepting comparable evidence, the performances of coached athletes are not a display of the coach's work in a comparable sense to artistic exhibitions.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
For OAC, the petitioner submitted only a single vague letter that did not constitute a proper affidavit and provided insufficient evidence of a leading/critical role or distinguished reputation. For UGA's team, the petitioner showed a leading/critical role but failed to demonstrate the team's distinguished reputation, as the website screenshots did not show significant NCAA-level success.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
For OAC, the petitioner submitted only a single vague letter that did not constitute a proper affidavit and provided insufficient evidence of a leading/critical role or distinguished reputation. For UGA's team, the petitioner showed a leading/critical role but failed to demonstrate the team's distinguished reputation, as the website screenshots did not show significant NCAA-level success.
This criterion expressly applies to performing artists and requires box office receipts or sales. The petitioner is an athletic coach, not a performing artist, and submitted no evidence of box office receipts or sales. Comparable evidence was unavailable because the standard criteria readily apply to the petitioner's occupation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
This criterion expressly applies to performing artists and requires box office receipts or sales. The petitioner is an athletic coach, not a performing artist, and submitted no evidence of box office receipts or sales. Comparable evidence was unavailable because the standard criteria readily apply to the petitioner's occupation.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence that his role was leading or critical for any team with a distinguished reputation. His collegiate playing profile showed limited starting time, and he failed to submit statistics differentiating his performance from teammates for professional teams. The AAO also noted the petitioner misrepresented team accomplishments.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence that his role was leading or critical for any team with a distinguished reputation. His collegiate playing profile showed limited starting time, and he failed to submit statistics differentiating his performance from teammates for professional teams. The AAO also noted the petitioner misrepresented team accomplishments.
Multiple submitted articles failed to meet the criterion: one lacked an identified author; a Wikipedia-sourced article was given no weight for reliability reasons; an RIA Novosti article had an incomplete translation, lacked an identified author, and was primarily about a game rather than the petitioner; and other website articles lacked identified authors or evidence of qualifying as major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Multiple submitted articles failed to meet the criterion: one lacked an identified author; a Wikipedia-sourced article was given no weight for reliability reasons; an RIA Novosti article had an incomplete translation, lacked an identified author, and was primarily about a game rather than the petitioner; and other website articles lacked identified authors or evidence of qualifying as major media.
The petitioner submitted contracts but failed to provide a proper basis for comparison showing his compensation was significantly high relative to others in the field. Prevailing wage data from Georgia for 'Athletes and Sports Competitors' was not an appropriate comparator for professional basketball players in Greece, Russia, or the United States.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner submitted contracts but failed to provide a proper basis for comparison showing his compensation was significantly high relative to others in the field. Prevailing wage data from Georgia for 'Athletes and Sports Competitors' was not an appropriate comparator for professional basketball players in Greece, Russia, or the United States.
Petitioner's earnings fell well below Level 3 and Level 4 prevailing wages and the upper pay levels for comparable Sales Training and Regional Sales Managers, so he failed to demonstrate a high salary in relation to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner's earnings fell well below Level 3 and Level 4 prevailing wages and the upper pay levels for comparable Sales Training and Regional Sales Managers, so he failed to demonstrate a high salary in relation to others in the field.
original business-related contributions of major significance
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found no evidence that petitioner's training programs, manuals, or product expertise had impact beyond his employer or significantly influenced the field at large. Contributions limited to one company do not equate to contributions of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found no evidence that petitioner's training programs, manuals, or product expertise had impact beyond his employer or significantly influenced the field at large. Contributions limited to one company do not equate to contributions of major significance.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
Information about the parent company does not demonstrate distinguished reputation of the immediate employer. Additionally, the regulation requires evidence of leading/critical roles for more than one distinguished organization, which petitioner did not provide.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Information about the parent company does not demonstrate distinguished reputation of the immediate employer. Additionally, the regulation requires evidence of leading/critical roles for more than one distinguished organization, which petitioner did not provide.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The awards reflect institutional recognition from the petitioner's employer, not nationally or internationally recognized prizes. Many awards postdated filing and could not be considered, and there was no evidence of national or international recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The awards reflect institutional recognition from the petitioner's employer, not nationally or internationally recognized prizes. Many awards postdated filing and could not be considered, and there was no evidence of national or international recognition.