membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that Cirque du Soleil is a circus performing business enterprise, not an association with membership; the selection process does not involve judging by recognized national or international experts; and even if it were qualifying, a single 'membership' does not satisfy the plural requirement.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that Cirque du Soleil is a circus performing business enterprise, not an association with membership; the selection process does not involve judging by recognized national or international experts; and even if it were qualifying, a single 'membership' does not satisfy the plural requirement.
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim at the top of the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that the 2001 French championship placing from over ten years ago is not indicative of sustained acclaim; the petitioner failed to show published material specifically about him in major media; the trampoline system lacks evidence of actual adoption in the field; and being one of ~1,000 Cirque du Soleil performers and one of ~70 KA cast members does not demonstrate individual top-of-field acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the 2001 French championship placing from over ten years ago is not indicative of sustained acclaim; the petitioner failed to show published material specifically about him in major media; the trampoline system lacks evidence of actual adoption in the field; and being one of ~1,000 Cirque du Soleil performers and one of ~70 KA cast members does not demonstrate individual top-of-field acclaim.
The AAO found no evidence confirming either event was a field hockey event, and no evidence establishing that a referee's role is the same or substantially similar to that of a judge.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found no evidence confirming either event was a field hockey event, and no evidence establishing that a referee's role is the same or substantially similar to that of a judge.
Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found no evidence about the selection process for the teams, the membership requirements for USA Field Hockey's 'basic coach' designation, or the reputation or prestige of any of the teams or organizations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found no evidence about the selection process for the teams, the membership requirements for USA Field Hockey's 'basic coach' designation, or the reputation or prestige of any of the teams or organizations.
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found no evidence of the eligibility, nomination, or selection process for any of the awards, no evidence of the reputation or prestige of the presenting entities, and the certifications were not properly translated as required under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found no evidence of the eligibility, nomination, or selection process for any of the awards, no evidence of the reputation or prestige of the presenting entities, and the certifications were not properly translated as required under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3).
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications
AAO 为什么未被说服
The articles were not fully translated per 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), the extracts were insufficient to establish the articles were about the petitioner, the publication was not shown to be a professional or major trade publication, no authors were provided, and the petitioner failed to show material published in more than one such publication.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The articles were not fully translated per 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), the extracts were insufficient to establish the articles were about the petitioner, the publication was not shown to be a professional or major trade publication, no authors were provided, and the petitioner failed to show material published in more than one such publication.
Leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found no evidence that being named best player in some games constituted a leading or critical role, no evidence of the Armenian national team's distinguished reputation, no evidence of the petitioner's role in the school's hierarchy or the school's reputation, and the Hockey Sports Club evidence postdated the 2001 filing date and lacked evidence of distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found no evidence that being named best player in some games constituted a leading or critical role, no evidence of the Armenian national team's distinguished reputation, no evidence of the petitioner's role in the school's hierarchy or the school's reputation, and the Hockey Sports Club evidence postdated the 2001 filing date and lacked evidence of distinguished reputation.
The AMI diploma showed only vocational training, not a baccalaureate-equivalent degree. Form G-325A is not a substitute for employer letters showing progressive post-baccalaureate experience. No official academic record of any degree was submitted.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AMI diploma showed only vocational training, not a baccalaureate-equivalent degree. Form G-325A is not a substitute for employer letters showing progressive post-baccalaureate experience. No official academic record of any degree was submitted.
national interest served substantially greater than U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
Counsel did not address the third NYSDOT prong concerning the individual alien's contributions. A prior labor certification is not a criterion for the national interest waiver and does not show that approving the petition without a current labor certification would be in the national interest.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel did not address the third NYSDOT prong concerning the individual alien's contributions. A prior labor certification is not a criterion for the national interest waiver and does not show that approving the petition without a current labor certification would be in the national interest.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters are largely conclusory. Even if the petitioner played a significant role in setting up a department, the criterion requires a leading or critical role for the organization itself, not just a department within it. Moreover, the criterion requires such a role in more than one qualifying organization, and only D.A.V. College was asserted.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters are largely conclusory. Even if the petitioner played a significant role in setting up a department, the criterion requires a leading or critical role for the organization itself, not just a department within it. Moreover, the criterion requires such a role in more than one qualifying organization, and only D.A.V. College was asserted.