可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 23551–23560

EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The nomination did not result in a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award. The certificate of honor and achievement award lacked evidence of national or international recognition. The petitioner abandoned the funding grants argument on appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The nomination did not result in a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award. The certificate of honor and achievement award lacked evidence of national or international recognition. The petitioner abandoned the funding grants argument on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_03_B2203; source_row=13976
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

Expert letters praised the petitioner's originality and talents but failed to explain how her contributions impacted the field of dance choreography as a whole at the level of major significance. Letters from personal contacts and collaborators were given reduced weight, and no independent documentary evidence of major impact was submitted.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Expert letters praised the petitioner's originality and talents but failed to explain how her contributions impacted the field of dance choreography as a whole at the level of major significance. Letters from personal contacts and collaborators were given reduced weight, and no independent documentary evidence of major impact was submitted.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_03_B2203; source_row=13980
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

This criterion is limited to visual artists displaying tangible works. The petitioner's dance performances are not equivalent to displaying works in galleries or museums, and accepting otherwise would collapse this criterion into the criterion at (viii).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
This criterion is limited to visual artists displaying tangible works. The petitioner's dance performances are not equivalent to displaying works in galleries or museums, and accepting otherwise would collapse this criterion into the criterion at (viii).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_03_B2203; source_row=13981
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

The committee membership list does not establish the petitioner's judging duties. The supporting letter asserts she contributes to artistic discussion but does not attribute actual judging or nominee selection duties to her.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The committee membership list does not establish the petitioner's judging duties. The supporting letter asserts she contributes to artistic discussion but does not attribute actual judging or nominee selection duties to her.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_03_B2203; source_row=13979
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO independently concluded the evidence does not show the beneficiary is significantly above almost all others in her field at a national or international level.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently concluded the evidence does not show the beneficiary is significantly above almost all others in her field at a national or international level.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=13972
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found petitioner submitted no documentary evidence supporting that this criterion does not apply to real estate.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found petitioner submitted no documentary evidence supporting that this criterion does not apply to real estate.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=13962
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material

证据为何得到认可

AAO acknowledged the director found that the beneficiary met this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged the director found that the beneficiary met this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=13963
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions

裁决如何说明

AAO considered this criterion abandoned because counsel did not contest the director's specific findings on appeal.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO considered this criterion abandoned because counsel did not contest the director's specific findings on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=13965
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found petitioner did not provide documentary evidence supporting non-applicability of this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found petitioner did not provide documentary evidence supporting non-applicability of this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=13966
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

artistic display

裁决如何说明

AAO treated as abandoned for failure to contest on appeal, while separately noting agreement that the criterion implicitly applies to visual arts and not to real estate.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO treated as abandoned for failure to contest on appeal, while separately noting agreement that the criterion implicitly applies to visual arts and not to real estate.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=13967
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评