可追溯来源的裁决研究
从大量个案裁决理由中检索，再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。
本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录，而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误；标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率，也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。
10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定
当前显示 23561–23570
案件事实
审查的问题
judging
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found petitioner did not submit documentary evidence supporting non-applicability.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
AAO found petitioner did not submit documentary evidence supporting non-applicability.
案件事实
审查的问题
awards
裁决如何说明
AAO deemed this issue abandoned because counsel did not contest the director's specific findings on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO deemed this issue abandoned because counsel did not contest the director's specific findings on appeal.
案件事实
审查的问题
substantial intrinsic merit
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's occupation in HIV/AIDS prevention has substantial intrinsic merit; this prong was not in dispute.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's occupation in HIV/AIDS prevention has substantial intrinsic merit; this prong was not in dispute.
案件事实
审查的问题
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the petitioner failed to credibly demonstrate he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker, largely because his actual employment at both TSS and CCGM was unrelated to HIV/AIDS, inconsistencies between CCGM's public materials and immigration-purpose letters undermined credibility, and no U.S. policy-making body had solicited his involvement.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
AAO found that the petitioner failed to credibly demonstrate he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker, largely because his actual employment at both TSS and CCGM was unrelated to HIV/AIDS, inconsistencies between CCGM's public materials and immigration-purpose letters undermined credibility, and no U.S. policy-making body had solicited his involvement.
案件事实
审查的问题
national in scope
证据为何得到认可
The AAO found the petitioner's arguments regarding national scope persuasive on appeal, distinguishing this from the third prong.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
The AAO found the petitioner's arguments regarding national scope persuasive on appeal, distinguishing this from the third prong.
案件事实
审查的问题
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner only addressed a single organization (the Izzie awards), failing to meet the plural requirement of the regulation. Moreover, the letter established impact on the committee rather than on the Isadora Duncan Dance Awards organization as a whole.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The petitioner only addressed a single organization (the Izzie awards), failing to meet the plural requirement of the regulation. Moreover, the letter established impact on the committee rather than on the Isadora Duncan Dance Awards organization as a whole.
案件事实
审查的问题
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Articles lacked required author attribution; publications were not shown to qualify as major media; many articles were about productions rather than about the petitioner personally; one article was written by the petitioner herself; and radio/television programs do not meet the plain language requirement of 'published material' with title, date, and author.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
Articles lacked required author attribution; publications were not shown to qualify as major media; many articles were about productions rather than about the petitioner personally; one article was written by the petitioner herself; and radio/television programs do not meet the plain language requirement of 'published material' with title, date, and author.
案件事实
审查的问题
high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner's comparison to minimum or median wages is not an appropriate basis for demonstrating significantly high remuneration. The record lacks reliable earnings evidence comparing the petitioner's pay to those performing similar work.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The petitioner's comparison to minimum or median wages is not an appropriate basis for demonstrating significantly high remuneration. The record lacks reliable earnings evidence comparing the petitioner's pay to those performing similar work.
案件事实
审查的问题
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO withdrew the director's finding, holding that criterion (vii) is limited to the visual arts and does not apply to performing artists. Because the petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions, she does not qualify.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The AAO withdrew the director's finding, holding that criterion (vii) is limited to the visual arts and does not apply to performing artists. Because the petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions, she does not qualify.
案件事实
审查的问题
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
Awards were presented to production companies or shows rather than to the petitioner personally; festival awards were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized; grants are designed to fund future projects rather than honor excellence; and nominations do not constitute receipt of a prize or award.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
Awards were presented to production companies or shows rather than to the petitioner personally; festival awards were not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized; grants are designed to fund future projects rather than honor excellence; and nominations do not constitute receipt of a prize or award.