60 months of progressive experience in the job offered or alternate occupations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The resubmitted experience letters still did not provide a sufficient description of the beneficiary's job duties and lacked the independent, objective evidence necessary to establish qualifying prior work experience under Matter of Ho.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The resubmitted experience letters still did not provide a sufficient description of the beneficiary's job duties and lacked the independent, objective evidence necessary to establish qualifying prior work experience under Matter of Ho.
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the field of advertising consulting is not inherently local and national advertising campaigns are commonplace; the national scope prong relates to the occupation, not the individual.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the director's finding because the field of advertising consulting is not inherently local and national advertising campaigns are commonplace; the national scope prong relates to the occupation, not the individual.
benefit national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the witness letters offered vague predictions and uncorroborated claims, that indirect evidence of a 2003 meeting did not establish responsibility for restructuring the auto industry, and that success in one field does not ensure success in a different field. Petitioner's prior achievements do not justify projections of future benefit in his newly adopted advertising field.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the witness letters offered vague predictions and uncorroborated claims, that indirect evidence of a 2003 meeting did not establish responsibility for restructuring the auto industry, and that success in one field does not ensure success in a different field. Petitioner's prior achievements do not justify projections of future benefit in his newly adopted advertising field.
national interest to a substantially greater degree than available U.S. workers
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that the petitioner's credentials, certifications, and TRB participation demonstrate she is a well-trained professional but do not show she has been an especially influential figure in her field or that her work had lasting or widespread impact on the profession. Academic degrees and certifications sufficient to support exceptional ability cannot alone establish eligibility for a national interest waiver.…
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the petitioner's credentials, certifications, and TRB participation demonstrate she is a well-trained professional but do not show she has been an especially influential figure in her field or that her work had lasting or widespread impact on the profession. Academic degrees and certifications sufficient to support exceptional ability cannot alone establish eligibility for a national interest waiver. Post-filing TRB invitations cannot retroactively establish eligibility as of the filing date.
national interest served to substantially greater degree than U.S. worker
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that the petitioner's citation record was modest and partially self-cited, his biofuel research had been abandoned shortly after filing the petition, his subsequent desalination work post-dated the filing date and could not establish retroactive eligibility, and the supporting letters were of questionable provenance and insufficiently corroborated.…
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the petitioner's citation record was modest and partially self-cited, his biofuel research had been abandoned shortly after filing the petition, his subsequent desalination work post-dated the filing date and could not establish retroactive eligibility, and the supporting letters were of questionable provenance and insufficiently corroborated. The petitioner had not demonstrated sustained interest in his work outside of his home institution.
The AAO did not dispute that alternative fuel research and desalination have substantial intrinsic merit, consistent with the director's acknowledgment.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO did not dispute that alternative fuel research and desalination have substantial intrinsic merit, consistent with the director's acknowledgment.
The employer letter described part-time teaching fellowship duties, not five years of full-time public performance experience. Performance certificates documented only individual events of brief duration. The beneficiary's own ETA 750 listed only part-time university employment, and no evidence reconciled the inconsistencies.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employer letter described part-time teaching fellowship duties, not five years of full-time public performance experience. Performance certificates documented only individual events of brief duration. The beneficiary's own ETA 750 listed only part-time university employment, and no evidence reconciled the inconsistencies.
Unaudited financial statements were not persuasive because they were compilations rather than audits. Certificates of deposit and bank statements were insufficient substitutes for audited balance sheets, and even assuming zero liabilities, the cash figures would not cover the proffered wage through 2008.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Unaudited financial statements were not persuasive because they were compilations rather than audits. Certificates of deposit and bank statements were insufficient substitutes for audited balance sheets, and even assuming zero liabilities, the cash figures would not cover the proffered wage through 2008.