AAO found the ETA Form 9089's no-education/no-experience/no-skills requirements conflict with the petitioner's website and contract requirements (experience, skills tests, screening), citing Matter of Ho on unresolved inconsistencies, and concluded the realism of the job offer was not established.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the ETA Form 9089's no-education/no-experience/no-skills requirements conflict with the petitioner's website and contract requirements (experience, skills tests, screening), citing Matter of Ho on unresolved inconsistencies, and concluded the realism of the job offer was not established.
AAO confirmed petitioner did not employ/pay the beneficiary, had negative net income (-$88,214) and negative net current assets (-$192,327) in 2008, and that totality-of-circumstances factors did not overcome the financial deficits, particularly given the many other sponsored beneficiaries.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed petitioner did not employ/pay the beneficiary, had negative net income (-$88,214) and negative net current assets (-$192,327) in 2008, and that totality-of-circumstances factors did not overcome the financial deficits, particularly given the many other sponsored beneficiaries.
foreign equivalent of required U.S. Master's degree
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed that the beneficiary's three-plus-two-year Indian education is not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. Master's. AAO relied on EDGE, distinguished the cited U.S. compressed/dual-degree programs, and gave less weight to the Trustforte evaluations as conflicting with EDGE.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the beneficiary's three-plus-two-year Indian education is not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. Master's. AAO relied on EDGE, distinguished the cited U.S. compressed/dual-degree programs, and gave less weight to the Trustforte evaluations as conflicting with EDGE.
AAO independently raised and resolved this issue against the petitioner because the petitioner did not adequately document its ability to pay all sponsored workers as requested by the AAO's RFE.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently raised and resolved this issue against the petitioner because the petitioner did not adequately document its ability to pay all sponsored workers as requested by the AAO's RFE.
foreign degree equivalency to U.S. bachelor's degree per labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The evaluations were internally inconsistent regarding PGD admission prerequisites and lacked documentary support, and the petitioner did not respond to the AAO's RFE seeking documentation of AICTE approval and entrance requirements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The evaluations were internally inconsistent regarding PGD admission prerequisites and lacked documentary support, and the petitioner did not respond to the AAO's RFE seeking documentation of AICTE approval and entrance requirements.
Counsel argued that the petitioner has been in business since 1996, became financially stable, experienced increased sales revenue in 2009, and that its financial status continues to grow. AAO found no facts paralleling Sonegawa sufficient to establish ability to pay, noting that future projections of increased income are insufficient and no uncharacteristic business expenditures or losses were demonstrated.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel argued that the petitioner has been in business since 1996, became financially stable, experienced increased sales revenue in 2009, and that its financial status continues to grow. AAO found no facts paralleling Sonegawa sufficient to establish ability to pay, noting that future projections of increased income are insufficient and no uncharacteristic business expenditures or losses were demonstrated.
The petitioner's 2008 Form 1120 showed net income of -$484,792.00, which is insufficient to cover the proffered wage. An unaudited profit and loss statement for 2009 likewise indicated insufficient net income.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's 2008 Form 1120 showed net income of -$484,792.00, which is insufficient to cover the proffered wage. An unaudited profit and loss statement for 2009 likewise indicated insufficient net income.
The petitioner argued that its German parent company financially supports it and is financially viable, but USCIS may not consider assets of shareholders or other enterprises because a corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner argued that its German parent company financially supports it and is financially viable, but USCIS may not consider assets of shareholders or other enterprises because a corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity.