可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 23801–23810

EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's citation evidence was unreliable—self-serving lists with no indicia of origin, SciFinder documents that did not identify which article was cited, and copies of citing articles showing only moderate citations. Expert letters described future benefits rather than already-realized impact. The petitioner failed to document actual major significance of his contributions.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's citation evidence was unreliable—self-serving lists with no indicia of origin, SciFinder documents that did not identify which article was cited, and copies of citing articles showing only moderate citations. Expert letters described future benefits rather than already-realized impact. The petitioner failed to document actual major significance of his contributions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-17_02_B2203; source_row=13688
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or significantly high remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's salary of $92,000 was compared only to average local San Diego salaries from Indeed.com, which is not a proper basis for comparison. The petitioner needed to show he commanded a high salary relative to top earners nationally in his field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's salary of $92,000 was compared only to average local San Diego salaries from Indeed.com, which is not a proper basis for comparison. The petitioner needed to show he commanded a high salary relative to top earners nationally in his field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-17_02_B2203; source_row=13691
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO withdrew the director's determination and found the petitioner's 16 scholarly articles in qualifying publications met the plain language requirements of this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the director's determination and found the petitioner's 16 scholarly articles in qualifying publications met the plain language requirements of this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-17_02_B2203; source_row=13689
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Ability to pay proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

Net income and net current assets were both negative in 2005; wages paid to the beneficiary were below the proffered wage; the audited financial statement was rejected because it improperly mixed cash and accrual accounting methods; unaudited statements and bank statements were not among the permissible evidence types under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2); and wages paid to a prior employee cannot be used to prove ability to pay.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Net income and net current assets were both negative in 2005; wages paid to the beneficiary were below the proffered wage; the audited financial statement was rejected because it improperly mixed cash and accrual accounting methods; unaudited statements and bank statements were not among the permissible evidence types under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2); and wages paid to a prior employee cannot be used to prove ability to pay.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-17_03_B5203; source_row=13694
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Five years of pre-priority-date experience in proffered position

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the signed employment letters fully documented over five years (including a letter confirming employment from 1997 to 2000 plus over four additional years) of experience consistent with the alien employment certification, satisfying the requirement.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the signed employment letters fully documented over five years (including a letter confirming employment from 1997 to 2000 plus over four additional years) of experience consistent with the alien employment certification, satisfying the requirement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-17_03_B5203; source_row=13695
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

realistic, full-time job offer

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO points to gaps in the 2009 payroll record (April and May missing) as suggesting non-full-time employment, and instructs the petitioner in any further filings to resolve conflicts in the evidence of pay and dates of employment and to establish that the position is for a full-time worker.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO points to gaps in the 2009 payroll record (April and May missing) as suggesting non-full-time employment, and instructs the petitioner in any further filings to resolve conflicts in the evidence of pay and dates of employment and to establish that the position is for a full-time worker.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=13683
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

Wages actually paid in 2008 ($24,080 per W-2) fell short of the prorated proffered wage; documentation contained unresolved discrepancies; the sole proprietor's 2008 adjusted gross income of $31,271 was less than annualized household expenses of $32,382.48; and 2009 evidence was inadequate under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2).

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Wages actually paid in 2008 ($24,080 per W-2) fell short of the prorated proffered wage; documentation contained unresolved discrepancies; the sole proprietor's 2008 adjusted gross income of $31,271 was less than annualized household expenses of $32,382.48; and 2009 evidence was inadequate under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=13682
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

job offer requires a professional holding an advanced degree

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO held that USCIS must apply the plain language of the labor certification and may not ignore any term. Because the ETA Form 9089 permits satisfaction of the minimum requirements through a 'master's equivalent based on any suitable combination of education, training or experience,' the job does not require an advanced degree. AILA liaison meeting minutes are non-binding and do not alter this result.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that USCIS must apply the plain language of the labor certification and may not ignore any term. Because the ETA Form 9089 permits satisfaction of the minimum requirements through a 'master's equivalent based on any suitable combination of education, training or experience,' the job does not require an advanced degree. AILA liaison meeting minutes are non-binding and do not alter this result.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-17_02_B5203; source_row=13693
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary

裁决如何说明

Counsel did not contest the director's finding on the high salary criterion; the AAO therefore considered this issue abandoned.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Counsel did not contest the director's finding on the high salary criterion; the AAO therefore considered this issue abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-13_03_B2203; source_row=13681
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

Pursuant to Kazarian, the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence to demonstrate that he meets the plain language of the scholarly articles regulation. However, meeting only this one criterion is insufficient as at least three criteria are required.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Pursuant to Kazarian, the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence to demonstrate that he meets the plain language of the scholarly articles regulation. However, meeting only this one criterion is insufficient as at least three criteria are required.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2012-01-13_03_B2203; source_row=13679
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评