AAO found that criterion vii is limited to visual artists and does not apply to the petitioner, whose field is educating and social activism rather than the arts. The petitioner is not a visual artist and therefore is not eligible to meet the plain language of this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that criterion vii is limited to visual artists and does not apply to the petitioner, whose field is educating and social activism rather than the arts. The petitioner is not a visual artist and therefore is not eligible to meet the plain language of this criterion.
The petitioner did not contest the director's findings on this criterion during the prior certification proceeding, so the AAO treated it as abandoned. The resubmitted evidence is also not 'new' under 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not contest the director's findings on this criterion during the prior certification proceeding, so the AAO treated it as abandoned. The resubmitted evidence is also not 'new' under 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The new embassy letter lacked corroborating documentary evidence and the petitioner failed to show it was previously unavailable. The petitioner had at least four prior opportunities to submit such evidence. No evidence submitted qualifies as 'new' under 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The new embassy letter lacked corroborating documentary evidence and the petitioner failed to show it was previously unavailable. The petitioner had at least four prior opportunities to submit such evidence. No evidence submitted qualifies as 'new' under 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).
The petitioner did not contest the director's findings on this criterion during the prior certification, so the AAO treated it as abandoned. Even if the appreciation letters were considered, they would not qualify as new evidence unavailable at the time of prior proceedings.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not contest the director's findings on this criterion during the prior certification, so the AAO treated it as abandoned. Even if the appreciation letters were considered, they would not qualify as new evidence unavailable at the time of prior proceedings.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The resubmitted articles were not new evidence but corrections to previously deficient materials. The petitioner failed to show the evidence was previously unavailable; a motion to reopen cannot be used to improve upon previously deficient evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The resubmitted articles were not new evidence but corrections to previously deficient materials. The petitioner failed to show the evidence was previously unavailable; a motion to reopen cannot be used to improve upon previously deficient evidence.
beneficiary's degree matches field of study required by labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The labor certification required a master's in Business Administration and disallowed alternate fields; the beneficiary's MS in Mechanical Engineering does not satisfy that requirement under the plain language of the ETA Form 9089.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification required a master's in Business Administration and disallowed alternate fields; the beneficiary's MS in Mechanical Engineering does not satisfy that requirement under the plain language of the ETA Form 9089.
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Articles either were about soccer games rather than the petitioner himself, only mentioned him in passing, lacked required author identification, or were not accompanied by circulation evidence showing the publications qualify as major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Articles either were about soccer games rather than the petitioner himself, only mentioned him in passing, lacked required author identification, or were not accompanied by circulation evidence showing the publications qualify as major media.
nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner submitted only third-party recommendation letters rather than primary documentary evidence from organizers or newspapers. Even if the awards existed, there was no evidence they were nationally or internationally recognized beyond the presenting organizations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner submitted only third-party recommendation letters rather than primary documentary evidence from organizers or newspapers. Even if the awards existed, there was no evidence they were nationally or internationally recognized beyond the presenting organizations.
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
Letters indicated a leading role but lacked official competitive results such as comprehensive team rankings distinguishing his teams from other successful soccer teams. Conclusory assertions without supporting documentary evidence were insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters indicated a leading role but lacked official competitive results such as comprehensive team rankings distinguishing his teams from other successful soccer teams. Conclusory assertions without supporting documentary evidence were insufficient.
original athletic contributions of major significance in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
Recommendation letters established the petitioner was a talented player but did not demonstrate original contributions of major significance. The record did not show his influence on other players or that the field changed as a result of his work.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Recommendation letters established the petitioner was a talented player but did not demonstrate original contributions of major significance. The record did not show his influence on other players or that the field changed as a result of his work.