可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 23961–23970

NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

Net current assets sufficient to cover proffered wage

AAO 为什么未被说服

Net current assets, while facially sufficient for the instant beneficiary, were inadequate when the competing proffered wages of simultaneously pending I-140 petitions were considered. The AAO rejected adding lines of credit (an unenforceable bank commitment, not an existing asset) and noted accounts receivable was already included in Schedule L current assets.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Net current assets, while facially sufficient for the instant beneficiary, were inadequate when the competing proffered wages of simultaneously pending I-140 petitions were considered. The AAO rejected adding lines of credit (an unenforceable bank commitment, not an existing asset) and noted accounts receivable was already included in Schedule L current assets.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-16_01_B5203; source_row=13513
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that expert letters from colleagues at a single university were not corroborated by independent evidence, the petitioner had only one published article (a case report), documentary evidence of NIH participation was lacking, new evidence (travel grant, hematology membership) post-dated the filing date and was unsubstantiated, and the petitioner's achievements did not distinguish him sufficiently from other oncologi…

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that expert letters from colleagues at a single university were not corroborated by independent evidence, the petitioner had only one published article (a case report), documentary evidence of NIH participation was lacking, new evidence (travel grant, hematology membership) post-dated the filing date and was unsubstantiated, and the petitioner's achievements did not distinguish him sufficiently from other oncologists to warrant a waiver.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-15_01_B5203; source_row=13510
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's World Peace Award evidence contained irreconcilable inconsistencies (year and number of entrants), and the certificates from Golden Ox Art Corp. and World Art Center were found to be falsifications from dissolved corporations. The petitioner did not overcome these deficiencies.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's World Peace Award evidence contained irreconcilable inconsistencies (year and number of entrants), and the certificates from Golden Ox Art Corp. and World Art Center were found to be falsifications from dissolved corporations. The petitioner did not overcome these deficiencies.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-15_01_B2203; source_row=13499
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material

AAO 为什么未被说服

The publication lacked evidence of qualifying as major media, and included work by scores of other artists with only a brief sentence or two about the petitioner—it was not 'about the alien' as required by the regulation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The publication lacked evidence of qualifying as major media, and included work by scores of other artists with only a brief sentence or two about the petitioner—it was not 'about the alien' as required by the regulation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-15_01_B2203; source_row=13501
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display

AAO 为什么未被说服

The certificates from Golden Ox Art Corp. and World Art Center were falsifications from dissolved corporations, and the petitioner's motion otherwise failed to present new facts establishing display at artistic exhibitions.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The certificates from Golden Ox Art Corp. and World Art Center were falsifications from dissolved corporations, and the petitioner's motion otherwise failed to present new facts establishing display at artistic exhibitions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-15_01_B2203; source_row=13505
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that while published research is national in scope in principle, the petitioner's minimal research record appeared tied to his ongoing training, and the record contained no evidence he would continue as a researcher after training. The NIH project involved 'communication with cancer patients' rather than research toward a cure, and no documentary evidence supported claims of widespread readership or impact.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while published research is national in scope in principle, the petitioner's minimal research record appeared tied to his ongoing training, and the record contained no evidence he would continue as a researcher after training. The NIH project involved 'communication with cancer patients' rather than research toward a cure, and no documentary evidence supported claims of widespread readership or impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-15_01_B5203; source_row=13509
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not dispute that oncology as a specialty has substantial intrinsic merit; this prong was effectively conceded.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not dispute that oncology as a specialty has substantial intrinsic merit; this prong was effectively conceded.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-15_01_B5203; source_row=13508
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

The beneficiary was paid below the $65,000 proffered wage in all years from 2007 to 2010. The petitioner's Form 1120S showed negative net income each year (as low as -$5.8M in 2007) and negative net current assets throughout. Pay stubs were insufficient to show payments beyond those reflected in the W-2s.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary was paid below the $65,000 proffered wage in all years from 2007 to 2010. The petitioner's Form 1120S showed negative net income each year (as low as -$5.8M in 2007) and negative net current assets throughout. Pay stubs were insufficient to show payments beyond those reflected in the W-2s. The petitioner's refusal to provide employment and payment data for its other 14 beneficiaries, combined with declining gross sales, precluded a favorable totality-of-circumstances determination.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-15_02_B5203; source_row=13511
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO's prior decisions found the petitioner failed to meet this criterion; the current motion repeated earlier arguments without new facts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO's prior decisions found the petitioner failed to meet this criterion; the current motion repeated earlier arguments without new facts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-15_01_B2203; source_row=13500
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found reliance on witness letters with shared/templated language, lack of objective documentation, anecdotal selection of favorable examples, and that credit for drug development belongs to researchers rather than investors. Refusing to invest in drugs does not serve the national interest, and exceptional ability is not an automatic basis for a waiver.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found reliance on witness letters with shared/templated language, lack of objective documentation, anecdotal selection of favorable examples, and that credit for drug development belongs to researchers rather than investors. Refusing to invest in drugs does not serve the national interest, and exceptional ability is not an automatic basis for a waiver.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-12-14_05_B5203; source_row=13498
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评