可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 24051–24060

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree or foreign equivalent

证据为何得到认可

AAO consulted AACRAO EDGE, which confirmed that the five-year diplom spetsialista from the Russian educational system is comparable to a U.S. master's degree, consistent with the multiple credential evaluations submitted. The beneficiary's single five-year combined degree qualifies as a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. master's degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO consulted AACRAO EDGE, which confirmed that the five-year diplom spetsialista from the Russian educational system is comparable to a U.S. master's degree, consistent with the multiple credential evaluations submitted. The beneficiary's single five-year combined degree qualifies as a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. master's degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_02_B5203; source_row=13406
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO finds the petitioner served as a peer reviewer for multiple scientific journals and reviewed research grant proposals.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the petitioner served as a peer reviewer for multiple scientific journals and reviewed research grant proposals.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=13400
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

证据为何得到认可

AAO independently performs the final merits determination and finds the totality of evidence (expert letters, citations, publications, peer review, grant review) shows the petitioner is at the very top of the field with sustained acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently performs the final merits determination and finds the totality of evidence (expert letters, citations, publications, peer review, grant review) shows the petitioner is at the very top of the field with sustained acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=13403
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

Petitioner authored numerous articles in major scientific journals including Nature Biotechnology, Biochemistry, and Journal of Biochemistry.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner authored numerous articles in major scientific journals including Nature Biotechnology, Biochemistry, and Journal of Biochemistry.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=13402
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

Expert letters specifically describe how the petitioner's contributions are original and of major significance, and citation evidence showing hundreds of cites corroborates that the work has influenced others in the field of glycobiology.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Expert letters specifically describe how the petitioner's contributions are original and of major significance, and citation evidence showing hundreds of cites corroborates that the work has influenced others in the field of glycobiology.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=13401
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

beneficiary meets job requirements on labor certification

证据为何得到认可

Because the beneficiary's five-year Soviet diploma is the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree, the beneficiary satisfies the master's degree in engineering requirement on the labor certification. Combined with demonstrated qualifying experience exceeding two years, the beneficiary meets all stated job requirements.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the beneficiary's five-year Soviet diploma is the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree, the beneficiary satisfies the master's degree in engineering requirement on the labor certification. Combined with demonstrated qualifying experience exceeding two years, the beneficiary meets all stated job requirements.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=13405
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

foreign equivalent degree qualifying as advanced degree

证据为何得到认可

EDGE, the AACRAO-maintained database, confirms that the five-year Soviet diplom spetsialista is comparable to a U.S. master's degree. Three independent credential evaluators reached the same conclusion, and the beneficiary's single five-year degree qualifies as a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. advanced degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
EDGE, the AACRAO-maintained database, confirms that the five-year Soviet diplom spetsialista is comparable to a U.S. master's degree. Three independent credential evaluators reached the same conclusion, and the beneficiary's single five-year degree qualifies as a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. advanced degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=13404
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

national in scope

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with counsel that the national scope of the petitioner's work is not in dispute.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with counsel that the national scope of the petitioner's work is not in dispute.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_03_B5203; source_row=13409
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the petitioner's 450 documented citations (averaging 112 per article) objectively demonstrate highly influential research, and that it is immaterial that the work was done as a student since past record need not be limited to prior work experience. The director failed to engage with the citation evidence entirely.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the petitioner's 450 documented citations (averaging 112 per article) objectively demonstrate highly influential research, and that it is immaterial that the work was done as a student since past record need not be limited to prior work experience. The director failed to engage with the citation evidence entirely.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_03_B5203; source_row=13410
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial intrinsic merit

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with counsel that intrinsic merit of the petitioner's work in nanoscience was not in dispute.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with counsel that intrinsic merit of the petitioner's work in nanoscience was not in dispute.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-11-21_03_B5203; source_row=13408
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评