published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
All submitted articles and photographs related to the beneficiary's work as a tennis player, not as a tennis coach. No published material about the beneficiary in professional or major trade publications or major media relating to his work as a tennis coach was submitted.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
All submitted articles and photographs related to the beneficiary's work as a tennis player, not as a tennis coach. No published material about the beneficiary in professional or major trade publications or major media relating to his work as a tennis coach was submitted.
Considering the totality of evidence, the beneficiary is a former professional tennis player now coaching junior regional-level players. His evidence falls far short of demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim as a coach or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of that field. The AAO notes that references' own accomplishments are far more impressive than the beneficiary's coaching record.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Considering the totality of evidence, the beneficiary is a former professional tennis player now coaching junior regional-level players. His evidence falls far short of demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim as a coach or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of that field. The AAO notes that references' own accomplishments are far more impressive than the beneficiary's coaching record.
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The beneficiary's role at WTO is subordinate to the founder/director and is not distinguished as leading or critical when compared to other employees. WTO's distinguished reputation was not established through independent evidence. Additionally, the criterion requires leading or critical roles for organizations (plural), and the petitioner only claimed eligibility based on one organization.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The beneficiary's role at WTO is subordinate to the founder/director and is not distinguished as leading or critical when compared to other employees. WTO's distinguished reputation was not established through independent evidence. Additionally, the criterion requires leading or critical roles for organizations (plural), and the petitioner only claimed eligibility based on one organization.
All claimed prizes and awards were won by the beneficiary as a tennis competitor, not as a tennis coach, and therefore fall outside his field of endeavor for classification purposes. The petitioner presented no evidence of any nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards earned as a tennis coach.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
All claimed prizes and awards were won by the beneficiary as a tennis competitor, not as a tennis coach, and therefore fall outside his field of endeavor for classification purposes. The petitioner presented no evidence of any nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards earned as a tennis coach.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
Regarding STA, the beneficiary joined as a junior player based on achievements as a competitor, not as a coach, so the membership is not in his current field of endeavor. Regarding USPTA, the Professional 3 rating is entry-level, does not require tennis teaching experience, and passing standardized examinations does not constitute outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Regarding STA, the beneficiary joined as a junior player based on achievements as a competitor, not as a coach, so the membership is not in his current field of endeavor. Regarding USPTA, the Professional 3 rating is entry-level, does not require tennis teaching experience, and passing standardized examinations does not constitute outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
original contributions of major significance in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The recommendation letters largely describe the beneficiary's accomplishments as a player, speak only to his potential future impact as a coach, or document modest coaching achievements limited to regional junior players. No letter establishes that the beneficiary has already made original contributions of major significance in the coaching field, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The recommendation letters largely describe the beneficiary's accomplishments as a player, speak only to his potential future impact as a coach, or document modest coaching achievements limited to regional junior players. No letter establishes that the beneficiary has already made original contributions of major significance in the coaching field, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing.
single foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate
AAO 为什么未被说服
The combination of a two-year B.A. and a Postgraduate Diploma does not constitute a single foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate, and the NIPM is not shown to be a college or university.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The combination of a two-year B.A. and a Postgraduate Diploma does not constitute a single foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate, and the NIPM is not shown to be a college or university.
The petitioner's net income for fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006 was deeply negative (($3,454,967), ($1,733,424), and ($2,928,375) respectively), and the petitioner failed to submit tax returns for fiscal year 2003 (the priority date year) and fiscal years 2007–2010 despite an AAO RFE.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's net income for fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006 was deeply negative (($3,454,967), ($1,733,424), and ($2,928,375) respectively), and the petitioner failed to submit tax returns for fiscal year 2003 (the priority date year) and fiscal years 2007–2010 despite an AAO RFE.
While net current assets were positive in fiscal years 2005 and 2006 and sufficient to cover the wage shortfall in those years, they were negative in fiscal year 2004, and the petitioner failed to submit data for the priority date year (fiscal year 2003) or for fiscal years 2007–2010. Additionally, the petitioner's multiple concurrent petitions require it to demonstrate ability to pay all beneficiaries, which it did not do.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While net current assets were positive in fiscal years 2005 and 2006 and sufficient to cover the wage shortfall in those years, they were negative in fiscal year 2004, and the petitioner failed to submit data for the priority date year (fiscal year 2003) or for fiscal years 2007–2010. Additionally, the petitioner's multiple concurrent petitions require it to demonstrate ability to pay all beneficiaries, which it did not do.
Beneficiary meets minimum education on labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found no evidence that California International University is accredited by a nationally or regionally recognized accrediting agency, and therefore the degree cannot be accepted as qualifying education for immigrant processing purposes.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found no evidence that California International University is accredited by a nationally or regionally recognized accrediting agency, and therefore the degree cannot be accepted as qualifying education for immigrant processing purposes.