可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 24701–24710

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the petitioner performed in a critical role as crew chief and lead mechanic, the record did not establish that the organizations he worked for had a distinguished reputation. Wikipedia evidence was disregarded as unreliable, and no other documentary evidence established a distinguished reputation for the relevant racing teams.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the petitioner performed in a critical role as crew chief and lead mechanic, the record did not establish that the organizations he worked for had a distinguished reputation. Wikipedia evidence was disregarded as unreliable, and no other documentary evidence established a distinguished reputation for the relevant racing teams.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_03_B2203; source_row=12696
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's Crew Chief of the Year Award was mentioned only briefly in articles with undocumented circulation, and no evidence established the award's national or international recognition. The 2005 World Series championship was not confirmed as the petitioner's personal award by the employer letter. The Top Wrench Award was received after the filing date and could not be considered.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's Crew Chief of the Year Award was mentioned only briefly in articles with undocumented circulation, and no evidence established the award's national or international recognition. The 2005 World Series championship was not confirmed as the petitioner's personal award by the employer letter. The Top Wrench Award was received after the filing date and could not be considered. Claims made on appeal were unsupported by documentary evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_03_B2203; source_row=12693
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

None of the letters confirm that the petitioner was selected to serve as a judge of the work of others.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the letters confirm that the petitioner was selected to serve as a judge of the work of others.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_04_B2203; source_row=12702
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record contains no published articles by the petitioner.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contains no published articles by the petitioner.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_04_B2203; source_row=12704
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record contains no prizes or awards.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contains no prizes or awards.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_04_B2203; source_row=12699
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 商业成功未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 商业成功

commercial successes in the performing arts

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner's occupation is not within the performing arts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner's occupation is not within the performing arts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_04_B2203; source_row=12708
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in qualifying associations

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record contains no documentation of qualifying memberships.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contains no documentation of qualifying memberships.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_04_B2203; source_row=12700
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or remuneration

AAO 为什么未被说服

The petitioner submitted no pay statements or evidence of salary or how it compared to others in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner submitted no pay statements or evidence of salary or how it compared to others in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_04_B2203; source_row=12707
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

AAO 为什么未被说服

Even assuming the petitioner's role rose to the level of a critical role for a distinguished organization, that would only satisfy one criterion, which is insufficient to meet the threshold of three.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Even assuming the petitioner's role rose to the level of a critical role for a distinguished organization, that would only satisfy one criterion, which is insufficient to meet the threshold of three.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_04_B2203; source_row=12706
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record contains no published material about the petitioner or the mergers discussed in the letters.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contains no published material about the petitioner or the mergers discussed in the letters.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2011-04-19_04_B2203; source_row=12701
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评