AAO agreed the record did not identify the specific endeavor with sufficient detail and did not show prospective impact rising to national importance; references to skills/experience belonged under prong two, and the CARES Act did not show government interest in the specific endeavor.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the record did not identify the specific endeavor with sufficient detail and did not show prospective impact rising to national importance; references to skills/experience belonged under prong two, and the CARES Act did not show government interest in the specific endeavor.
AAO concluded the evidence addressed the importance of the field generally rather than the national importance of the specific endeavor; the business plan's revenue and job creation projections were unsupported and not shown to have substantial positive economic effects regionally or nationally.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the evidence addressed the importance of the field generally rather than the national importance of the specific endeavor; the business plan's revenue and job creation projections were unsupported and not shown to have substantial positive economic effects regionally or nationally.
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence established the general importance of related fields but did not explain or demonstrate the potential prospective impact of the Petitioner's specific proposed innovations. Counsel's assertions on appeal did not constitute evidence, and the Petitioner failed to establish that his endeavor would have broader national implications.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence established the general importance of related fields but did not explain or demonstrate the potential prospective impact of the Petitioner's specific proposed innovations. Counsel's assertions on appeal did not constitute evidence, and the Petitioner failed to establish that his endeavor would have broader national implications.
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance, distinguishing between the importance of telemedicine as an industry and the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance, distinguishing between the importance of telemedicine as an industry and the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. AAO found that general articles, adjacent national initiatives, and modest employment projections (5 employees in year one) were insufficient to show substantial positive economic effects or government interest in the specific endeavor.
AAO found the business plan's revenue and job creation projections lacked sufficient basis and that even if they were substantiated, a 14-job, $17 million business does not operate at a nationally important scale. The Petitioner did not show broader implications beyond his immediate clients, and the labor shortage argument was unpersuasive because such shortages are addressed through the labor certification process.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the business plan's revenue and job creation projections lacked sufficient basis and that even if they were substantiated, a 14-job, $17 million business does not operate at a nationally important scale. The Petitioner did not show broader implications beyond his immediate clients, and the labor shortage argument was unpersuasive because such shortages are addressed through the labor certification process.
AAO found the Director's first-prong analysis was entirely based on a mischaracterization of the Petitioner's field and remanded for proper analysis of the actual proposed endeavor.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's first-prong analysis was entirely based on a mischaracterization of the Petitioner's field and remanded for proper analysis of the actual proposed endeavor.
AAO found the Director failed to explain how company registration documents qualify as a license to practice as a software engineer or entrepreneur, and withdrew the Director's conclusion on this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director failed to explain how company registration documents qualify as a license to practice as a software engineer or entrepreneur, and withdrew the Director's conclusion on this criterion.
AAO found the Director analyzed an entirely wrong field of endeavor (airline industry) and remanded for proper analysis of the Petitioner's actual endeavor as a software engineer and entrepreneur.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director analyzed an entirely wrong field of endeavor (airline industry) and remanded for proper analysis of the Petitioner's actual endeavor as a software engineer and entrepreneur.