可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 29012910

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程工程师

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the leading or critical role criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the threshold of three criteria, making this issue unnecessary to the outcome.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the leading or critical role criterion because the Petitioner could not satisfy the threshold of three criteria, making this issue unnecessary to the outcome.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_02_B2203; source_row=40662
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because the failure on the first prong is dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because the failure on the first prong is dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_03_B5203; source_row=40668
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the failure on the first prong is dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the failure on the first prong is dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_03_B5203; source_row=40669
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

The AAO explicitly reserved determination on the third prong because the first prong was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO explicitly reserved determination on the third prong because the first prong was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_04_B5203; source_row=40672
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

电子 / 电气工程

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

The AAO explicitly reserved determination on the second prong because the first prong was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO explicitly reserved determination on the second prong because the first prong was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_04_B5203; source_row=40671
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the second prong, noting the evidence predominantly demonstrates his past experience, work history, and accomplishments which relate to whether he is well-positioned.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met the second prong, noting the evidence predominantly demonstrates his past experience, work history, and accomplishments which relate to whether he is well-positioned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_05_B5203; source_row=40674
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence showed impact on individual users and employers but did not demonstrate broader national or global implications in the software quality assurance field.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence showed impact on individual users and employers but did not demonstrate broader national or global implications in the software quality assurance field. The recommendation letters did not show solutions were shared beyond individual companies, the teaching proposals lacked metrics demonstrating broader impact on STEM education, and the open source evidence did not explain how the tools were being used industry-wide. Citing STEM priorities does not substitute for showing the specific endeavor's national impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_05_B5203; source_row=40673
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the Director's analysis erroneous and conflicting, noting the Director disregarded the Petitioner's stated intention to continue as a competitive triathlete. Upon de novo review, AAO concluded the 2022 bronze medal and supporting evidence of the competition's reputation and contemporaneous media coverage satisfied the criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis erroneous and conflicting, noting the Director disregarded the Petitioner's stated intention to continue as a competitive triathlete. Upon de novo review, AAO concluded the 2022 bronze medal and supporting evidence of the competition's reputation and contemporaneous media coverage satisfied the criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=40650
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to fully conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but in the aggregate found the record insufficient to establish the required level of acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to fully conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but in the aggregate found the record insufficient to establish the required level of acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=40654
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published materials in major trade or professional publications or other major media

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports satisfaction of this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports satisfaction of this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-09-12_01_B2203; source_row=40652
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评