final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
裁决如何说明
AAO did not conduct a full final merits determination due to the Petitioner's failure to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted the aggregate record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not conduct a full final merits determination due to the Petitioner's failure to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted the aggregate record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
AAO noted the Director found prong two was met. AAO did not separately analyze prong two as the appeal was resolved against the petitioner on prong one, and AAO did not disturb the Director's finding.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the Director found prong two was met. AAO did not separately analyze prong two as the appeal was resolved against the petitioner on prong one, and AAO did not disturb the Director's finding.
AAO reserves the issue because the failure to establish national importance of the proposed endeavor is dispositive of the appeal, making it unnecessary to reach whether the Petitioner qualifies for EB-2 exceptional ability classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserves the issue because the failure to establish national importance of the proposed endeavor is dispositive of the appeal, making it unnecessary to reach whether the Petitioner qualifies for EB-2 exceptional ability classification.
membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdraws because the record does not show these industry organizations require members to hold at least a U.S. baccalaureate or foreign equivalent, as required by the regulatory definition of 'profession.'
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdraws because the record does not show these industry organizations require members to hold at least a U.S. baccalaureate or foreign equivalent, as required by the regulatory definition of 'profession.'
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdraws because, although the letters and awards praise the Petitioner's skills and successes within her employment, they do not identify significant contributions to the industry or field as a whole.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdraws because, although the letters and awards praise the Petitioner's skills and successes within her employment, they do not identify significant contributions to the industry or field as a whole.
AAO found that the Director did not address this criterion but, upon review of the initial evidence, concluded the Petitioner met it based on her peer review service.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Director did not address this criterion but, upon review of the initial evidence, concluded the Petitioner met it based on her peer review service.