AAO accepted new wage data on appeal because the Director never issued an RFE about the salary evidence before denial. The new evidence showed the Petitioner's 2023 salary exceeded average and high salaries for business intelligence analysts. AAO found by a preponderance that the Petitioner commanded a high salary in her field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepted new wage data on appeal because the Director never issued an RFE about the salary evidence before denial. The new evidence showed the Petitioner's 2023 salary exceeded average and high salaries for business intelligence analysts. AAO found by a preponderance that the Petitioner commanded a high salary in her field.
AAO found that opening a supermarket in Florida primarily benefits local customers and the local community without demonstrating broader implications in the food distribution industry nationally or globally.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that opening a supermarket in Florida primarily benefits local customers and the local community without demonstrating broader implications in the food distribution industry nationally or globally. The business plan's unsupported financial projections and general economic assertions were insufficient, and even if the projections were well-founded, the revenue and job creation levels would not constitute substantial positive economic effects or demonstrate the business would be in an economically depressed area.
AAO reviewed the record and found the translator certifications did include language stating the translations were 'true, accurate, and complete,' contradicting the Director's finding. AAO therefore accepted the evidence and found the Petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reviewed the record and found the translator certifications did include language stating the translations were 'true, accurate, and complete,' contradicting the Director's finding. AAO therefore accepted the evidence and found the Petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the letters were not from 'current or former employer(s)' as required—two were from colleagues on plain paper and one was from an administrative assistant. The documented work experience covered only certain periods, falling short of ten years.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the letters were not from 'current or former employer(s)' as required—two were from colleagues on plain paper and one was from an administrative assistant. The documented work experience covered only certain periods, falling short of ten years.
License or certification for a particular profession or occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the certificate merely shows registration and good standing but the Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to establish that this qualifies as a certification for a particular occupation, particularly given that the record does not establish that an industrial/mechanical technician meets the definition of a profession.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the certificate merely shows registration and good standing but the Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to establish that this qualifies as a certification for a particular occupation, particularly given that the record does not establish that an industrial/mechanical technician meets the definition of a profession.
AAO rejected the Petitioner's proposed interpretation that the definition of 'profession' should be expanded to include arts occupations not requiring a bachelor's degree, holding that this goes against the plain language of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The Petitioner cited no authority and submitted no corroborating evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected the Petitioner's proposed interpretation that the definition of 'profession' should be expanded to include arts occupations not requiring a bachelor's degree, holding that this goes against the plain language of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2). The Petitioner cited no authority and submitted no corroborating evidence.
official academic record (degree/diploma/certificate from institution of learning)
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion. The Petitioner relied solely on his own descriptions without corroborating evidence, and bare assertions alone are insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion. The Petitioner relied solely on his own descriptions without corroborating evidence, and bare assertions alone are insufficient.