AAO found that even if the Petitioner meets his revenue and staffing projections, his endeavor's economic impact does not rise to the level of national importance. Operating in an industry subject to national initiatives is insufficient on its own, and the Petitioner has not demonstrated broader implications or potential prospective impact on a national level.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that even if the Petitioner meets his revenue and staffing projections, his endeavor's economic impact does not rise to the level of national importance. Operating in an industry subject to national initiatives is insufficient on its own, and the Petitioner has not demonstrated broader implications or potential prospective impact on a national level. The patent for the cement block facilities lacked information on viability or potential impact.
AAO found that transcripts confirming attendance and degree completion were in fact present in the record, the Petitioner's legal education relates to his consulting endeavor, and as a lawyer he is a member of the professions under the Act.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that transcripts confirming attendance and degree completion were in fact present in the record, the Petitioner's legal education relates to his consulting endeavor, and as a lawyer he is a member of the professions under the Act.
AAO found the Petitioner conflated importance of the broader industry/profession with the specific endeavor, did not show his consulting endeavor aims to advance STEM technologies/research with broader implications, and did not corroborate business plan figures or demonstrate that projected revenues and 6-18 positions would yield substantial positive economic effects regionally or nationally.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner conflated importance of the broader industry/profession with the specific endeavor, did not show his consulting endeavor aims to advance STEM technologies/research with broader implications, and did not corroborate business plan figures or demonstrate that projected revenues and 6-18 positions would yield substantial positive economic effects regionally or nationally.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner's Colombian pilot licenses are not licenses to practice a 'profession' as defined under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), which requires a U.S. baccalaureate degree or equivalent as the minimum entry requirement.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner's Colombian pilot licenses are not licenses to practice a 'profession' as defined under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2), which requires a U.S. baccalaureate degree or equivalent as the minimum entry requirement.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not provide evidence, such as membership requirements, to establish these associations qualify as 'professional associations' consistent with the regulatory definition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Petitioner did not provide evidence, such as membership requirements, to establish these associations qualify as 'professional associations' consistent with the regulatory definition.