可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 32013210

EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

经济学博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed with the Director's ultimate conclusion, finding that the Petitioner's work as an associate professor and short-term UN research fellow did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim, her publication/citation evidence lacked adequate verification and context, and her judging and administrative activities did not rise to the extraordinary ability level.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director's ultimate conclusion, finding that the Petitioner's work as an associate professor and short-term UN research fellow did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim, her publication/citation evidence lacked adequate verification and context, and her judging and administrative activities did not rise to the extraordinary ability level.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_02_B2203; source_row=40170
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

经济学博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the Petitioner's peer review activity and service as chairperson on thesis examination panels meets the plain language of the criterion, though it did not reflect extraordinary ability-level acclaim.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's peer review activity and service as chairperson on thesis examination panels meets the plain language of the criterion, though it did not reflect extraordinary ability-level acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_02_B2203; source_row=40167
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the submitted evidence addressed the tourism industry and small businesses generally, not the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. The expert opinions did not indicate national or global implications for the travel industry. The business plan's projected employment of nine people fell short of demonstrating substantial economic benefit to the United States.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the submitted evidence addressed the tourism industry and small businesses generally, not the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. The expert opinions did not indicate national or global implications for the travel industry. The business plan's projected employment of nine people fell short of demonstrating substantial economic benefit to the United States.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_02_B5203; source_row=40172
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong 2 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong 2 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_02_B5203; source_row=40173
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer and labor certification

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong 3 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong 3 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_02_B5203; source_row=40174
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the third prong as unnecessary to reach given that the second prong was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the third prong as unnecessary to reach given that the second prong was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_06_B5203; source_row=40188
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong because the dispositive finding on the first prong rendered it unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong because the dispositive finding on the first prong rendered it unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_09_B5203; source_row=40197
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the dispositive finding on the first prong rendered it unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the dispositive finding on the first prong rendered it unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_09_B5203; source_row=40198
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

EB-2 Exceptional Ability Final Merits Determination

裁决如何说明

AAO noted the Director's analysis appeared inadequate but explicitly reserved this issue due to other dispositive factors resolving the appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the Director's analysis appeared inadequate but explicitly reserved this issue due to other dispositive factors resolving the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_07_B5203; source_row=40189
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

On balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO did not address the third prong, as the first prong was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not address the third prong, as the first prong was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-22_07_B5203; source_row=40192
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评