可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 32313240

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

Because the first prong was dispositive, AAO expressly reserved the second prong and declined to reach it.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the first prong was dispositive, AAO expressly reserved the second prong and declined to reach it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_04_B5203; source_row=40152
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 重大国际奖项申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 重大国际奖项

One-time major internationally recognized award

裁决如何说明

The Director concluded the record does not establish a one-time major internationally recognized award. The Petitioner did not contest this finding on appeal, thereby waiving it.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director concluded the record does not establish a one-time major internationally recognized award. The Petitioner did not contest this finding on appeal, thereby waiving it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=40128
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

Authorship of scholarly articles (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vi))

证据为何得到认可

The Director found criterion (vi) satisfied, and the Petitioner reasserted it on appeal. AAO implicitly affirmed this finding.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found criterion (vi) satisfied, and the Petitioner reasserted it on appeal. AAO implicitly affirmed this finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=40131
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

Participation as judge of others' work (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv))

证据为何得到认可

The Director found criterion (iv) satisfied, and the Petitioner reasserted it on appeal. AAO implicitly affirmed this finding by adopting the Director's overall analysis.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found criterion (iv) satisfied, and the Petitioner reasserted it on appeal. AAO implicitly affirmed this finding by adopting the Director's overall analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=40129
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (criteria other than iv-vi)

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not assert on appeal that the record satisfies criteria other than (iv)-(vi), thereby waiving all remaining criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not assert on appeal that the record satisfies criteria other than (iv)-(vi), thereby waiving all remaining criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=40132
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach the second prong because the first prong was not met, making the ultimate outcome dispositive at that stage.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the second prong because the first prong was not met, making the ultimate outcome dispositive at that stage.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_03_B5203; source_row=40149
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))

AAO 为什么未被说服

The new employer letter was outside the record and need not be considered on a motion to reconsider, but in any event the letters and certifications attest to experience and personal achievements rather than significant contributions to the aviation mechanics field as a whole.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The new employer letter was outside the record and need not be considered on a motion to reconsider, but in any event the letters and certifications attest to experience and personal achievements rather than significant contributions to the aviation mechanics field as a whole.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_02_B5203; source_row=40144
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))

AAO 为什么未被说服

Because PAMA's regular-member requirements are FAA part 65 mechanic/repairman certification or equivalent — not a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent — PAMA does not meet the regulatory definition of a professional association.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because PAMA's regular-member requirements are FAA part 65 mechanic/repairman certification or equivalent — not a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent — PAMA does not meet the regulatory definition of a professional association.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_02_B5203; source_row=40143
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

ten years of full-time experience in the occupation (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))

裁决如何说明

AAO treated the issue as waived because the Petitioner did not discuss eligibility for this criterion in any detail or explain how the appellate decision was based on incorrect law or policy.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO treated the issue as waived because the Petitioner did not discuss eligibility for this criterion in any detail or explain how the appellate decision was based on incorrect law or policy.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_02_B5203; source_row=40142
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence threshold, but noted in dicta that the record does not establish the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence threshold, but noted in dicta that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-21_02_B2203; source_row=40141
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评